ArticleSports medicine - open2025
Associations between Starting to Exercise in Later Life and Survival among Older Adults: a Nationwide, Community-based, Prospective Cohort Study in China.
Article in Sports medicine - open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPhysical inactivity and prolonged sedentary behavior represent significant public health concerns that can be addressed to achieve considerable health benefits. However, it is unknown whether starting to exercise in later life is an effective intervention for promoting health and longevity in older adults who have not exercised previously. The study aimed to explore whether starting to exercise in later life could offer survival benefits for older adults (≥ 65 years), particularly focusing on the impact of exercise duration on survival.
methodsA total of 23,889 older participants (median age: 91.0 [IQR: 82.0-100.0], 8760 males) from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey were included. Participants comprised non-exercisers who never exercised and regular exercisers who started to exercise regularly after age 65 for at least one year. The exposure was exercise duration, which was self-reported and categorized into four groups: non-exercise (0 years), 1 to < 10 years, 10 to < 20 years, and ≥ 20 years. The study outcome was overall survival. Accelerated failure time models were used to investigate the association between exercise duration and outcomes.
resultsDuring a follow-up period totaling 101118.9 person-years, there were 18,751 recorded deaths (78.5%). Overall, regular exercisers had longer survival time than non-exercisers, with an adjusted time ratio (TR) of 1.07 (95% CI: 1.03-1.11, p < 0.001). When compared to non-exercisers, the adjusted TRs for participants with varying exercise durations were as follows: 1.06 (95% CI: 0.99-1.14, p = 0.086) for those exercising between 1 and < 10 years, 1.03 (95% CI: 0.97-1.08, p = 0.382) for those between 10 and < 20 years, and significantly higher at 1.12 (95% CI: 1.05-1.18, p < 0.001) for those with ≥ 20 years of exercise duration. In addition, smooth curve fitting analysis also revealed the survival benefits of exercise were only significant for those with an exercise duration of ≥ 20 years, with an adjusted TR of 1.024 (95% CI: 1.013-1.036, p < 0.001) for each 5-year increase in duration.
conclusionsStarting to exercise in later life can provide survival benefits for older adults, but only if they maintain exercise for over 20 years. This long latency period may suggest suboptimal exercise efficiency among older adults in real-world contexts; therefore, it is essential not only to emphasize the importance of long-term exercise but also to promote structured exercise within this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.