ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2025
Attitudes of Mental Health Professionals Towards the Use of Routine Outcome Monitoring in Psychotherapeutic Inpatient Settings: A Thematic Analysis.
Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Routine outcome monitoring (ROM) involves the systematic recording of patient-reported outcome measures to monitor treatment progress and outcomes within psychotherapy. It represents an evidence-based approach to enhance psychotherapeutic treatment outcomes. However, it remains a rather controversial topic among mental health care professionals (MHP), resulting in its limited use in clinical practice, especially in inpatient settings. This qualitative interview study aimed to gain a comprehensive understanding of MHP attitudes towards ROM and its implementation within psychotherapeutic inpatient settings in Germany. In this study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with MHP working in the psychotherapeutic inpatient setting in the German healthcare system. Three independent researchers inductively coded the data, and thematic codebook analysis was used to evaluate the data iteratively. In total, 20 participants (14 medical doctors, and 6 clinical psychologists) with varying levels of working experience participated in the present study. The general attitude towards ROM and its implementation was predominantly positive, with ROM being perceived as a helpful feature to support psychotherapeutic inpatient treatment. However, possible pitfalls requiring careful consideration were highlighted, such as the risk of potential misuse and additional workload. The insights of the present study contribute to the ongoing discourse of ROM in mental health care. The study highlights the importance of proper implementation strategies and transparent communication regarding the relevance, aims, and use of ROM. Moreover, it highlights potential risks and perceived disadvantages associated with ROM, which may be related to implementation barriers and possible negative attitudes among MHP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.