ArticleProgress in orthodontics2025
3D comparative analysis of designed versus achieved maxillary teeth movements and influencing factors following first premolar extraction with invisalign: a new digital root model.
Article in Progress in orthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The 'Roller Coaster Effect' in Clear Aligner Premolar Extraction Cases: Posterior Open Bite and Cephalometric Risk Factors.Orthodontics & craniofacial research · 2026Article
- Three-dimensional crown-root movement in first premolar extraction cases treated with two clear aligner systems based on different materials: a retrospective cohort study.Progress in orthodontics · 2026Article
- Digital Design for Lower Incisor Position Correction in a Growing Patient with Mandibular Retrusion with ClinCheckÒ Software: A Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Clear Aligner Extraction Treatment with Caterpillar Motion Staging: Biomechanical Rationale, Clinical Protocol, and Report of Two Cases.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Tridimensional Analysis of Maxillary Teeth Movements in Premolar-Extraction Cases Treated With Clear Aligners.International dental journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to compare the designed and achieved maxillary teeth movements in patients undergoing first premolar extraction after the initial series of Invisalign MATERIALS AND
methodsThirty-three consecutive adult patients (Class I with crowding or bimaxillary protrusion) from a single clinical division who completed the first series of aligners after first premolar extractions were included in this retrospective study. The pretreatment, designed, and post-first series treatment teeth (crowns, roots, and bone) models were exported from ClinCheck
resultsSignificant discrepancies were observed between the designed and achieved maxillary tooth movements, particularly in mesiodistal (except U1) and buccolingual (except U6) angular tooth movements (P < 0.05). In contrast, non-significant discrepancies were observed in linear buccolingual movements (P > 0.05). Significant discrepancies in mesiodistal (all teeth) and vertical (U1, U5, U6) tooth movements were more pronounced (P < 0.05). Key influencing factors included the usage of TADs, aligner generation (G6), attachment design, overbite, and gender (P < 0.05).
conclusionsThis study highlights significant deviations between the designed and achieved maxillary teeth (crowns with roots) movements following the first premolar extractions in the initial series of Invisalign
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.