Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40591111›Full record

ArticleApplied biochemistry and biotechnology2025

Comparative Evaluation of Dilute Acid, Alkaline, and Deep Eutectic Solvent Pretreatments on Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Sunflower Stalk Bark.

Chaoyue Zhang, Lu Cheng, Xin Zhou, Shuiping Ouyang

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chaoyue Zhang *College of Advanced Materials Engineering, Jiaxing Nanhu University, 572 South Yuexiu Road, Jiaxing, 314001, People's Republic of China.
Lu Cheng *Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources, College of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China.
Xin ZhouJiangsu Co-Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources, College of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China.
Shuiping OuyangCollege of Advanced Materials Engineering, Jiaxing Nanhu University, 572 South Yuexiu Road, Jiaxing, 314001, People's Republic of China. ouyangsp1990@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4901-5755

Funding

Nanjing Forestry University student innovation training program 202310298012ZNational Nature Science Foundation of China 32201191Science and Technology Bureau of Jiaxing 2023AY31006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, in order to overcome the recalcitrance of sunflower stalk bark (SSB) residues, three kinds of pretreatment methods, i.e., dilute acid pretreatment, alkaline pretreatment, and deep eutectic solvent (DES) pretreatment, were employed to pretreat the SSB material. The effects of the different pretreatment methods for enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency and sugar recovery were evaluated. The enzymatic hydrolysis yield (EHY) of SSB after dilute sulfuric acid, NaOH, and DES pretreatment could be improved from 15.2% to 26.8%, 96.7%, and 93.3%, respectively. Among the three pretreatment methods, dilute acid could effectively decompose hemicellulose while preserving more lignin in the pretreated solids, and it could only enhance EHY within a limited range (< 30%). Compared with dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment, NaOH and choline chloride/lactic acid pretreatments could effectively remove not only hemicellulose but also lignin. Results showed that satisfactory EHY (> 90%) was observed in both alkaline and DES pretreated SSB solids. Besides, DES method was much more efficient in the extraction of lignin (95%) compared with NaOH pretreatment (80.2%). Lignin could be recovery by DES pretreatment as value-added by-product from SSB and was more environmentally friendly and sustainable during production. Finally, under the condition of 1:10 (w/w) solid to DES solution and 150 °C pretreatment temperature, the mass balance of DES-150 °C showed that 28.1 g glucose was obtained from 100 g SSB, and the glucose recovery yield was 77.6% of theoretical, demonstrating the potential of environmentally friendly DESs in biorefinery.

Indexed as

CellulaseDeep Eutectic SolventsHelianthusPlant BarkSodium HydroxideSulfuric AcidsHydrolysisLigninPolysaccharidesSolventsCellulaseDeep Eutectic SolventshemicelluloseLigninPolysaccharidesSodium HydroxideSolventssulfuric acidSulfuric AcidsBiorefineryEnzymatic hydrolysisPretreatmentSunflower stalk bark

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.