ArticleBlood research2025
Genomic risk factors for central nervous system relapse in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Article in Blood research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Impact of BTK Inhibitor Exposure in LymphGen-Defined MCD Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Hematological oncology · 2026Article
- Clinical, Biological, and Treatment-Related Predictors of Central Nervous System Relapse in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCentral nervous system (CNS) relapse is associated with poor survival, and remains an unmet challenge in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Identifying patients at high risk of CNS relapse and offering prophylactic treatment could improve patient prognosis.
methodsHere, we studied 234 patients with DLBCL using open patient-level clinical and sequencing data to explore risk factors for CNS relapse. Patients were divided into Cohort A (CNS involvement at baseline), Cohort B (CNS recurrence), and Cohort C (patients without secondary CNS involvement and with a follow-up interval > 3 years). We investigated the risk factors for CNS relapse in Cohorts B + C.
resultsGenetic alterations with statistical significance, determined by univariate analysis, and an incidence rate ≥ 5%, together with clinical factors, correlated with CNS relapse risk in a multivariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that concomitant MYD88 L265P and CDKN2A loss (p = 0.012), TET2 mutation (p = 0.037), ARID1A mutation (p = 0.010), and INO80 (p = 0.002) were independently correlated with a high risk of CNS relapse after adjusting for the IPI risk groups, B symptom and cell of origin (COO). The classifier that integrated genomic risk factors was superior in predicting CNS relapse (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC]: 0.91) compared with the IPI (AUROC: 0.77, p < 0.001) or IPI in combination with COO classifiers (AUROC: 0.81, p = 0.013).
conclusionThis study identified several genomic alterations as risk factors for CNS relapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.