Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40591093›Full record

ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2025

Time and video speed perception: a comprehensive investigation of the relation between estimated video speed, clip duration and original duration.

Verena Steinhof, Anna Schroeger, Roman Liepelt, Laura Sperl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Verena SteinhofDepartment of General Psychology: Judgment, Decision Making, Action, Faculty of Psychology, University of Hagen (FernUniversität in Hagen), Universitätsstraße 37, 58097, Hagen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Anna SchroegerDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Gießen (Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen), Alter Steinbacher Weg 38, 35394, Giessen, Hesse, Germany.
Roman LiepeltDepartment of General Psychology: Judgment, Decision Making, Action, Faculty of Psychology, University of Hagen (FernUniversität in Hagen), Universitätsstraße 37, 58097, Hagen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Laura SperlDepartment of General Psychology: Judgment, Decision Making, Action, Faculty of Psychology, University of Hagen (FernUniversität in Hagen), Universitätsstraße 37, 58097, Hagen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. laura.sperl@fernuni-hagen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8618-7587

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While decades of research have deepened our understanding of time perception, the perception of (manipulated) video speed has been relatively underexplored but is gaining interest with recent technological advances. This study systematically investigated human perception of video speed, clip duration and original duration across slow motion, original speed and time lapse. Results showed that participants consistently underestimated video speed in time lapse and overestimated it in slow motion, suggesting a tendency toward an internal perceptual standard. A similar pattern emerged for clip duration with videos being generally overestimated in their duration when played in accelerated speed, and underestimated in slow motion. For original duration estimations, this pattern was reversed. Surprisingly, while estimations of clip and original duration were highly correlated in all video speed conditions, both measures were uncorrelated with estimated video speed. However, an exploratory analysis suggested that the distorted perception of original duration may, at least in parts, still be rooted in participants relying on their own (but biased) interpretations of clip duration and video speed. Most importantly, these results reveal distortions in perception caused by altered video speeds, suggesting caution when employing these video techniques for judgments and decision-making. The findings provide foundation for further research, investigating the cognitive mechanisms of human video speed perception.

Indexed as

JudgmentMotion PerceptionTime PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleTime FactorsVideo RecordingYoung AdultClip durationOriginal durationSlow motionTime lapseTime perceptionTime reproduction taskVerbal estimationVideo speed

Identifiers

PMID40591093
PMCPMC12214220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.