ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Predictive biomarkers in the gut microbiome and metabolome for severe acute radiation enteritis in cervical cancer radiotherapy.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07259681 (Intestinal Microbiome Profiles in Women With Gynecological Tumors and Pelvic Toxicity Secondary to Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Intestinal Microbiome Profiles in Women With Gynecological Tumors and Pelvic Toxicity Secondary to Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy: Comparison With Controls and Effect of Rectal Ozone Treatment.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The microbiota-lymphocyte protective axis (MLPA): a novel paradigm for overcoming radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL) and potentiating the efficacy of tumor immuno-combination therapy.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2026Review
- Gut microbiota and microbiota-derived metabolites in radiation-induced injury: mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Microbiome-Driven Risk Stratification and Biotherapeutics in Radiation Enteritis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- Research Progress on the Relationship Between Radiation Enteritis and Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis.Cancer management and research · 2026Review
- Functional Recovery After Chemotherapy- and Radiotherapy-Induced Gastrointestinal Injury: Mechanisms, Clinical Assessment, and Management.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
- Mechanistic pathways predictive modeling and translational interventions for radiation enteritis in cervical cancer radiotherapy.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRadiation enteritis (RE), a common side effect, is a growing health concern, particularly the severe acute form of RE (SARE), among cervical cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy. Currently, there is no noninvasive diagnostic method for SARE. This study aimed to identify gut microbiomics- and metabolomics-based signatures, and assess their predictive value for SARE.
methodsSamples from 50 cervical cancer patients receiving volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were collected for gut microbiota and metabolomic profiling. 16 S rDNA amplicon sequencing analyzed gut microbiota, and nontargeted liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry determined metabolomic profiles. Multivariate and pathway analyses identify independent metabolites associated with SARE. A predictive nomogram for SARE, combining multi-omics-based signatures and clinical characteristics, was constructed and evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration curve.
resultsFecal microbiome analysis showed characteristic alterations in SARE, mainly including Faecalibacterium enterotype-3, Escherichia, and Shigella enterotype-2. Metabolomic analyses identified a panel of molecules significantly associated with SARE. Furthermore, an intuitive nomogram consisting of these multi-omics signatures (serum COX-2 and fecal phenylethylamine), combined with clinical characteristics with predictive value, was constructed to predict SARE. Notably, the evaluation of model performance suggested an excellent predictive discrimination for SARE [AUC, 0.975; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.953-0.998]. Calibration curve analysis showed an adequate calibration for the model and good consistency between the predicted SARE cases with this newly developed model and the actual SARE cases.
conclusionThis study identified noninvasive signatures, including COX-2 and phenylethylamine, as promising predictive biomarkers for SARE and developed an intuitive nomogram with good predictive accuracy for SARE in cervical cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.