ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Consciousness-only simple prognostic scale for subarachnoid hemorrhage: large database validation of the modified world federation of neurosurgical societies scale.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous studies have proposed the modified World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (m-WFNS) scale, which assesses impaired consciousness without considering neurological symptoms, as a simpler and more reliable predictor of outcomes before aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) treatment. However, large-scale external validation of the m-WFNS scale is lacking. This study aimed to perform an external validation of the m-WFNS scale and identify suitable subgroups using data from a prospective nationwide hospital-based registry from 2000 to 2020. We included 6,607 patients with single ruptured saccular aneurysms treated within 72 h of onset. The original WFNS (o-WFNS) grades II and III were reclassified as m-WFNS grades II for the Glasgow Coma Scale 14 and III for the Glasgow Coma Scale 13. The predictive accuracies for unfavorable outcomes, defined as modified Rankin Scale 3 or higher at discharge, were compared. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the o-WFNS and m-WFNS were 0.781 and 0.783, respectively (p-value, 0.01), demonstrating better calibration of the m-WFNS scale. Subgroup analysis showed significant improvements in predictive accuracy for patients younger than 75 years, Fisher group 3 subarachnoid hemorrhage, an aneurysm size of 6–14 mm, anterior communicating artery aneurysms, and internal carotid artery-posterior communicating artery aneurysms. No difference was observed for middle cerebral artery aneurysms. The m-WFNS, a simplified consciousness-based scale, demonstrated better predictive accuracy, particularly for anterior communicating artery and internal carotid artery-posterior communicating artery aneurysms. This scale will allow clinicians to easily predict prognostic prospects before treatment initiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40591008What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.