Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40590942›Full record

SynthesisLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025

Fluorescence indocyanine green (ICG) for sentinel-lymph-node mapping in colorectal cancer: a systematic review.

Alexis Litchinko, Jeremy Meyer, Leo Buhler, Frederic Ris, Michel Adamina

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Rethinking lymphadenectomy in the immunotherapy era of colorectal cancer: A hypothesis-generating perspective.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexis LitchinkoDivision of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211 , Genève 14, Switzerland. alexis.litchinko@gmail.com.
Jeremy MeyerDivision of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211 , Genève 14, Switzerland.
Leo BuhlerFaculty of Science, HFR Fribourg - Cantonal Hospital, Fribourg, CH-1711, Switzerland.
Frederic RisDivision of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211 , Genève 14, Switzerland.
Michel AdaminaFaculty of Science, HFR Fribourg - Cantonal Hospital, Fribourg, CH-1711, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveModern surgical guidance in laparoscopic colon cancer procedures could be enhanced by visualizing lymphatic flow during surgery, already helping surgeons in determining the precise extent of digestive resection and could be useful in lymphadenectomy. Related to oncological procedure, lymphadenectomy is mandatory to assess the extension of the disease. To explore this approach, the objective of this review is to examine the use of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging for real-time in vivo identification of lymphatic flow and especially sentinel nodes in patients undergoing elective surgery for colorectal cancer.

methodsA systematic review was conducted to identify relevant studies on sentinel node mapping using indocyanine green (ICG) in colorectal cancer surgery. A comprehensive search was performed in electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. The search strategy incorporated relevant keywords and MeSH terms, combining variations of "colorectal neoplasms," "sentinel lymph node," "indocyanine green," and related terms. The search was limited to articles published in English language.

resultsA total of 405 studies were identified across all databases. After screening, 45 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 12 studies were ultimately included in the systematic review. ICG-FI has not yet demonstrated superiority over the standard blue dye technique. Moreover, a notable heterogeneity exists among the reported studies concerning ICG dosage, injection methods and the definition of positive LN status for sensitivity calculations, making direct comparisons challenging.

conclusionDespite the potential shown with other surgical oncological resections, ICG-FI requires further investigation and standardization in protocols and indications to fully harness its capabilities for SLN detection in CRC, especially metastatic nodes. Larger patient populations should be considered in future research to comprehensively assess its efficacy. This systematic review highlights the heterogeneity and limitations of current evidence regarding ICG-FI for SLN detection in colorectal cancer. While preliminary results are encouraging, further well-designed prospective trials are required before routine clinical implementation can be recommended.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsIndocyanine GreenOptical ImagingSentinel Lymph NodeSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyColoring AgentsFluorescenceHumansLaparoscopyLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionColoring AgentsIndocyanine GreenColorectal cancerIndocyanine greenSentinel lymph node mappingSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40590942
PMCPMC12213974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.