ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025
A case of suspected transmission of group A Streptococcus from a dead body with streptococcal toxic shock syndrome to an autopsy worker.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autopsy workers are known to be at risk of contracting various infectious diseases from dead bodies. However, infections caused by group A Streptococcus (GAS, Streptococcus pyogenes) are rarely reported and often overlooked despite their potential severity. GAS infections can lead to serious complications, including streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (STSS). In this study, we conducted genetic analyses to identify the source of GAS bacteremia in a worker who conducted an autopsy on an individual who had developed STSS from GAS. GAS strains from the dead body and autopsy worker were analyzed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for five major streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin (SPE) genes (speA, speB, speC, speF, and ssa) and M protein (emm) typing by sequencing. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was performed to analyze seven housekeeping genes (gki, gtr, murI, mutS, recP, xpt, and yqiL) by PCR and sequencing. Both GAS strains were positive for speB and speF, negative for speA, speC, and ssa, and classified as emm81.0 and sequence type 117. This is the first report to demonstrate homology between GAS strains from a dead body and autopsy worker using the M-protein type, SPE gene expression, and MLST analysis. Although the autopsy was conducted in a controlled environment with appropriate personal protective equipment, including N95 masks, GAS contact transmission may have occurred during other handling procedures, such body transportation. These findings emphasize the need for stringent precautionary measures when handling dead bodies and their specimens, considering the risk of infection at any time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40590929What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.