Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40590928›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025

Predictive models for sex Estimation based on alveolar measurements in a contemporary Italian sample.

Carmen Tanga, Joan Viciano

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carmen TangaDepartment of Legal Medicine, Toxicology and Physical Anthropology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain. carmentanga@correo.ugr.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5053-9408
Joan VicianoIndependent Researcher, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7575-557X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Teeth play a significant role in reconstructive identification, aiding in the estimation of an individual's biological profile, such as population affinity, sex, and age at death. However, when teeth are lost postmortem-a common occurrence in forensic contexts-alternative methods are required. This study aimed to develop predictive models for sex estimation using alveolar measurements and to evaluate their reliability with a validation sample. Mesiodistal and buccolingual alveolar diameters from both arches were measured in 127 adults (64 males, 63 females) from the Certosa Cemetery osteological collection in Bologna. Binary logistic regression models were developed using a training subsample and tested on a hold-out subsample. The results indicated that the canine alveoli in both arches exhibited the highest sexual dimorphism, followed by those of the central incisor, first premolar, lateral incisor, and second premolar. In the training subsample, univariate predictive models achieved sex classification accuracy ranging from 57.3 to 83.9%, while multivariate models ranged from 68.0 to 91.3%. In the hold-out subsample of 19 individuals, sex was accurately estimated in 89.5% of cases, with a match rate of 63.2% compared with known biological sex. This study highlights the potential of alveolar measurements as a reliable alternative in forensic anthropology, offering a viable method for sex estimation when teeth are unavailable for measurement.

Indexed as

Alveolar ProcessSex Determination by SkeletonAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleForensic AnthropologyHumansItalyLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultAlveolar sizeBinary logistic regressionReconstructive human identificationSex estimationSexual dimorphism

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.