ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025
Predictive models for sex Estimation based on alveolar measurements in a contemporary Italian sample.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Teeth play a significant role in reconstructive identification, aiding in the estimation of an individual's biological profile, such as population affinity, sex, and age at death. However, when teeth are lost postmortem-a common occurrence in forensic contexts-alternative methods are required. This study aimed to develop predictive models for sex estimation using alveolar measurements and to evaluate their reliability with a validation sample. Mesiodistal and buccolingual alveolar diameters from both arches were measured in 127 adults (64 males, 63 females) from the Certosa Cemetery osteological collection in Bologna. Binary logistic regression models were developed using a training subsample and tested on a hold-out subsample. The results indicated that the canine alveoli in both arches exhibited the highest sexual dimorphism, followed by those of the central incisor, first premolar, lateral incisor, and second premolar. In the training subsample, univariate predictive models achieved sex classification accuracy ranging from 57.3 to 83.9%, while multivariate models ranged from 68.0 to 91.3%. In the hold-out subsample of 19 individuals, sex was accurately estimated in 89.5% of cases, with a match rate of 63.2% compared with known biological sex. This study highlights the potential of alveolar measurements as a reliable alternative in forensic anthropology, offering a viable method for sex estimation when teeth are unavailable for measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40590928What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.