ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2025
Intranasal esketamine significantly alleviates depression severity and suicidal ideations in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) non-responders.
Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intranasal esketamine for ECT-refractory bipolar depression: a case report.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIntranasal esketamine (ESK) is a novel therapy option in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Patients with a history of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) non-response (ECT+) in the current episode have usually been excluded from previous studies. Data on the effectiveness of ESK in ECT non-responders are sparse.
methodsIn this retrospective study, we investigated the effectiveness of intranasal ESK in real-world inpatients with (ECT+, n = 39) history of ECT non-response compared to patients who have not received an adequate course of ECT in their current episode (ECT-, n = 57). A factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) has been used to determine the impact of ECT non-response on treatment outcome.
resultsA total of n = 96 patients (mean age 47.0; 52.1% women) with TRD were included in this study. There was a significant main effect of history of ECT non-response on MADRS score in the ANOVA (F = 10.386, p = 0.002). However, there was no significant interaction effect of time (pre-treatment, post-treatment)*history of ECT non-response in current episode (F = 2.166, p = 0.143). The response (34.9% vs. 21.9%, χ2 = 1.498, p = 0.167) and remission rates (24.4% vs. 12.1%, χ2 = 1.861, p = 0.141) were none significantly lower in the ECT + group than in the ECT- group. There was significant improvement in MADRS and BDI-II in the ECT + group. No major safety concerns occurred during the study.
conclusionThere was no significant impact of ECT non-response on esketamine treatment outcome. Our results support the approach to offer esketamine to ECT non-responders given that the array of treatment alternatives is limited for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.