Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40590923›Full record

ReviewEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2026

Enhancing mental health care: a problem, resources and goals oriented multidimensional framework (PRoGO).

Stefan Leucht, Bernhard König, Antonio di Francesco, Alessandro Rodolico, Josef Priller, Kerem Böge, Wolfgang Strube, Jochen Gensichen, Peter Bechmann, Amr ElDeeb and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Stefan LeuchtDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. Stefan.Leucht@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4934-4352
Bernhard KönigPraxis Deisenhofen, Jägerstr. 16a, 82041, Oberhaching, Germany.
Antonio di FrancescoDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Alessandro RodolicoDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Josef PrillerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Kerem BögeCharité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Wolfgang StrubeGerman Center for Mental Health (Partner Site Munich-Augsburg), Munich, Germany.
Jochen GensichenGerman Center for Mental Health (Partner Site Munich-Augsburg), Munich, Germany.
Peter BechmannGerman Center for Mental Health (Partner Site Munich-Augsburg), Munich, Germany.
Amr ElDeebDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Alkomiet HasanGerman Center for Mental Health (Partner Site Munich-Augsburg), Munich, Germany.
Steffen MoritzDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Markus JägerDistrict Hospital Kempten, Kempten, Germany.
Claudia LeuchtMax Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.
Jim van Os *Department of Psychiatry, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
John M Davis *Psychiatric Institute, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

German Center for Mental Health FKZ: 01EE2303C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLawrence Weed introduced the "Problem-Oriented Medical Records" (POMR) approach to medicine. Its core principle is that treatment should be organised around patients' specific problems. This approach gained widespread adoption in the United States during the 1970s. However, few studies have compared POMR with the traditional "source-based" method, and evidence supporting its application in mental health remains particularly limited.

methodsWe carried out a narrative review to examine whether POMR is appropriate for mental health care and which modifications are necessary for this purpose.

findingsPsychiatry and psychotherapy address brain-mediated disorders that lack clear biological markers. Diagnoses rely on the assessment of psychopathological symptoms, which are grouped into syndromes. These symptoms and syndromes can be effectively categorized as "problems". Given that psychiatric treatment is often symptomatic in that it focuses on symptoms rather than diagnoses, POMR provides an ideal framework for organizing care. Furthermore, mental health is inherently multidimensional, encompassing biological, psychological, social, and existential domains. This complexity necessitates interdisciplinary collaboration. However, under the conventional source-based approach, professional groups often operate in parallel rather than jointly together. POMR, by contrast, facilitates seamless collaboration by aligning teams around patient-centred problems. A special aspect of mental health care is the emphasis on considering patients' individual goals and resources, rather than focusing only on their deficits.

interpretationBy systematically applying POMR to psychiatric care-particularly through tightly coordinated interdisciplinary treatment-clinicians could enhance both clinical and functional outcomes, improve both patient and team satisfaction, and better align treatment with patients' unique needs. To support this approach, we propose a practical grid which we refer to as the Problem-Resources-Goals Oriented framework (PRoGO), reflecting the necessary adaptations for mental health. Clinical trials are warranted to assess the effectiveness of POMR/PRoGO in psychiatric practice and its potential to advance the field.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental Health ServicesPsychiatryPsychotherapyHumansAnxietyDepressionLawrence WeedMental healthProblem-oriented medical recordsPsychiatrySchizophreniaTransdiagnostic

Identifiers

PMID40590923
PMCPMC12904919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.