ReviewBlood advances2025
Therapeutic innovations in hemophilia: the essential role of a positive reinvestment cycle.
Review in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subcutaneous MG1113 in severe hemophilia A and B: phase 1b study for safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Current Status of Clinical Gene Therapy for Hemophilia and Globin Disorders.Journal of blood medicine · 2026Review
- Adherence to Clotting Factor Prophylaxis in Adolescent and Adult Males With Haemophilia.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of HemophiliaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractHemophilia stands out among rare genetic diseases for its significant therapeutic advancements, closely tied to substantial financial investments. Key factors driving this progress include severe hemorrhagic consequences from an early age, its impact on royal families, the HIV and hepatitis C contamination tragedies, the identification of factor VIII (FVIII) and FIX genes, and advancements in biotechnology. Maintaining low, measurable concentrations of FVIII or FIX in the blood has proven pivotal in improving patient outcomes. The mobilization of the global hemophilia community, led by the World Federation of Hemophilia, the European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders, and the National Bleeding Disorder Foundation, has continuously advocated for access to safe, effective treatments. With reinvestments from biopharmaceutical partners, revolutionary options, including gene therapy, have emerged. However, this cycle of innovation and investment, essential for curing all patients worldwide, faces potential threats. This article aims to highlight the critical importance of investing in hemophilia treatment and research, a topic of concern for all stakeholders within the hemophilia community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.