ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2025
What a Sham(e): Sham-Controlled Conditioned Pain Modulation Effects on Pressure but Not Heat Pain Thresholds in Healthy Volunteers.
Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- What a Sham(e): Sham-Controlled Conditioned Pain Modulation Effects on Pressure but Not Heat Pain Thresholds in Healthy Volunteers.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConditioned pain modulation (CPM) is a well-established experimental paradigm to study descending pain modulation in humans, measuring the pain modulatory effect of a painful conditioning stimulus (CS) on a painful test stimulus (TS). Control conditions using a non-painful CS accounting for modulatory effects not attributable to the painfulness of the CS are seldom included. Thus, this study aimed to differentiate CPM effects from perceived changes of the TS unrelated to the painfulness of the CS by comparing effects of a painful and a control CS on four different TS.
methodsForty-nine healthy participants underwent a combined parallel and sequential CPM paradigm with a cold water bath (median NRS 8/10) as painful and an ambient-temperature sham water bath (median NRS 0/10) as non-painful control CS. TS were pressure and heat pain thresholds (PPT, HPT) (parallel and sequential) and temporal summation of pain (TSP, sequential) (pressure and heat). Larger TS changes with the painful compared to the control CS were interpreted as sham-controlled CPM effects.
resultsA parallel sham-controlled CPM effect was only detected for PPT (significantly larger PPT increases during the painful compared to the control condition (p = 0.009)). HPT increased for both conditions without a significant difference between conditions (p = 0.152). TSP was successfully induced but not modulated by either CS (p > 0.05).
conclusionThis study demonstrates sham-controlled CPM effects on PPT, but not on HPT, most likely due to heat adaptation or habituation. This challenges the interpretation of prior studies using CPM paradigms with HPT as TS without a control condition. SIGNIFICANCE: This study highlights the importance of including control conditions in CPM paradigms using HPT as TS. HPT increased similarly during a painful and a control condition, most likely due to adaptation and habituation. Although these are known effects, CPM studies rarely control for them. Pressure pain thresholds increased more during the painful than during the control condition, making it a more suitable TS, especially when a control condition is absent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.