Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40590696›Full record

ArticleRadiology2025

Posttreatment MRI to Predict Pathologic Complete Response of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy.

Toulsie Ramtohul, Derek Lollivier, Justine Spriet, Maxime Jin, Lounes Djerroudi, Thomas Gaillard, Claire Bonneau, Delphine Loirat, Diana Bello-Roufai, Youlia Kirova and 10 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Toulsie RamtohulDepartment of Radiology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8440-7785
Derek LollivierDepartment of Radiology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France.ORCID 0009-0009-3628-9006
Justine SprietDepartment of Radiology, Institut Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
Maxime JinDepartment of Radiology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France.ORCID 0009-0008-4636-8472
Lounes DjerroudiDepartment of Diagnostic and Theranostic Medicine - Pathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5007-2964
Thomas GaillardDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7062-9379
Claire BonneauDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6251-286X
Delphine LoiratDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie Paris, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Diana Bello-RoufaiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie Paris, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Youlia KirovaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie Paris, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Pierre LoapDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie Paris, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Caroline MalhaireDepartment of Radiology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9235-9816
Anne Vincent SalomonDepartment of Diagnostic and Theranostic Medicine - Pathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5754-5771
François-Clément BidardDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie Paris, PSL Research University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5932-8949
Anne TardivonDepartment of Radiology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2371-3391
Audrey MaillezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0475-8631
Lauren WallaertDepartment of Radiology, Institut Godinot, Reims, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6513-1306
Luc CeugnartDepartment of Radiology, Institut Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
Caroline Nhy *Department of Radiology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France.ORCID 0009-0009-2660-7381
Luc Cabel *Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie Paris, PSL Research University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5515-9180

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NACI) has substantially improved pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the predictive accuracy of posttreatment MRI remains unexplored. Purpose To assess the performance of posttreatment MRI in the prediction of pCR in participants with TNBC treated with NACI. Materials and Methods In this prospective multicenter study (August 2021-June 2024), women with early TNBC were recruited from three centers (training set: Institut Curie; test set: Institut Godinot and Institut Oscar Lambret). Post-NACI dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI scans from multiple vendors were analyzed. Radiologic complete response (rCR)-defined as no enhancement in the tumor bed-was evaluated for predicting pCR. A multivariable logistic regression model incorporating rCR, nodal involvement, and Ki-67 index was developed and externally validated. In cases with residual enhancement (non-rCR), a radiomic score using shape and first-order features was tested. Results A total of 175 women were included in the training set (mean age, 49 years ± 11 [SD]) and 84 women in the external test set (mean age, 52 years ± 12). The rCR at MRI was predictive of pCR, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.75, 0.92). The combined model (rCR + nodal status + Ki-67) yielded an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.96) in the test set. In node-negative patients with Ki-67 greater than 30%, the rCR false-discovery rate (ie, the proportion of rCR cases that were actually non-pCR or residual disease missed at breast MRI) was 3.6% (two of 56) in the training set and 3.5% (one of 29) in the test set; all cancers were limited to residual cancer burden I. In non-rCR cases, a model incorporating the radiomics score and lesion count achieved an AUC of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.90). Conclusion Posttreatment rCR at MRI demonstrated strong predictive value for pCR in early TNBC following NACI. © RSNA, 2025

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoadjuvant TherapyTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAdultBreastContrast MediaFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPathologic Complete ResponsePredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID40590696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.