ArticleAustralian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc2025
Ideal Horizontal X-Ray Beam Angulation for Maxillary Molars. A Retrospective Clinical Study Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
Article in Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyse cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images to determine the ideal horizontal X-ray beam angulations for maxillary first and second molars. CBCT scans from 85 patients were retrospectively analysed to measure the angles at which buccal root canals (MB, DB) of maxillary first (n = 170) and second (n = 157) molars superimpose the palatal one (P) at coronal and apical levels. The mean angles and standard deviations for both tooth types combined at which MB1 and MB2 overlap with P, as well as the angle at which DB overlaps with P, were 114.01° (±9.30), 119.47° (±11.05) and 87.48° (±12.02), respectively. Angles at coronal levels were higher for both tooth types and all canals. If maxillary molar teeth show no signs of tilt, rotation or unusual anatomy, a distal tube shift of > 18°, based on the orthoradial direction (90°), should be chosen to achieve ideal visual canal separation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.