ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2025
Validation and multi-site deployment of a lyophilized qRT-PCR reagent for the molecular diagnosis of avian influenza and rabies in Sub-Saharan African regions.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biosafety of rabies virus and related lyssaviruses: Risks, precautions, and knowledge gaps in diagnostic and research laboratories.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular methods are widely accepted as gold-standard techniques for the laboratory diagnosis of most human and animal pathogens. However, most molecular protocols rely on reagents that need to be transported and stored at a freezing temperature, a requirement that might affect their reliability in areas where the cold chain cannot be guaranteed. Over the years, several lyophilized molecular products have been marketed to circumvent this issue. We therefore evaluated the feasibility of replacing liquid reagents with freeze-dried formulations for the molecular diagnosis of avian influenza (AIV) and rabies (RABV) viruses, two priority zoonotic pathogens widely spread in Sub-Saharan Africa. Among six different commercial freeze-dried kits, we selected one reagent due to its easy-to-use features, single-reaction format, and preliminary performance assessment. Through a more in-depth evaluation, we determined its analytical and diagnostic performance and formulation stability and obtained results comparable to those of standard liquid master mixes. However, for the detection of divergent lyssaviruses, the lyophilized reagent's sensitivity was affected by suboptimal complementarity between the oligonucleotides and target sequences. Finally, a multi-site evaluation in four veterinary diagnostic laboratories located in Sub-Saharan Africa demonstrated the successful deployment of AIV and RABV assays utilizing the freeze-dried reagent, which can interchangeably replace liquid qRT-PCR/RT-PCR kits. Altogether, our results indicate that the investigated lyophilized master mix represents a valid alternative to liquid reagents for the molecular diagnosis of avian influenza and rabies and has the potential for broader applications to other relevant infectious diseases upon proper validation.IMPORTANCEMolecular diagnostic protocols rely on reagents that need to be transported and stored at freezing temperatures. Meeting this requirement can be challenging in areas where the maintenance of the cold chain is not guaranteed, such as in Sub-Saharan Africa. Our study aimed to assess the feasibility of using lyophilized reagents as a replacement for liquid reagents in the molecular diagnosis of two widespread zoonotic pathogens in Sub-Saharan Africa, namely, avian influenza and rabies. To accomplish this, we selected a commercially available lyophilized reagent based on its format and performance characteristics. We conducted a laboratory validation to assess the use of the lyophilized reagent throughout the entire diagnostic process. We also conducted a reproducibility test involving African laboratories as potential end-users. Our findings confirm that the lyophilized reagent can replace traditional liquid reagents to diagnose rabies and avian influenza and suggest its possible use for a wider range of infectious diseases after undergoing appropriate validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.