Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40590553›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2025

Validation and multi-site deployment of a lyophilized qRT-PCR reagent for the molecular diagnosis of avian influenza and rabies in Sub-Saharan African regions.

Petra Drzewnioková, Irene Brian, Marzia Mancin, Andrea Fortin, Morgane Gourlaouen, Angélique Angot, Mamadou Niang, Isaac Dah, Kouramoudou Berete, Adama Diakite and 9 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Petra DrzewniokováIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5180-5974
Irene BrianIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Marzia MancinIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Andrea FortinIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Morgane GourlaouenFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
Angélique AngotFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
Mamadou NiangFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Accra, Ghana.
Isaac DahLaboratoire National Vétérinaire de Yaoundé, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Kouramoudou BereteLaboratoire Central de Diagnostic Vétérinaire de Conakry, Conakry, Guinea.
Adama DiakiteLaboratoire Central Vétérinaire de Bamako, Bamako, Mali.
Fatou Tall LoLaboratoire National d'Elevage et de Recherches Vétérinaires de Dakar, Dakar, Senegal.
Clement MesekoNational Veterinary Research Institute, Vom, Nigeria.
Emilie Go-MaroLaboratoire Central Vétérinaire de Lomé, Lomé, Togo.
Valeria D'AmicoIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Viviana ValastroIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Baba SoumareFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
Paola De BenedictisIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Isabella MonneIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Valentina PanzarinIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9376-1612

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular methods are widely accepted as gold-standard techniques for the laboratory diagnosis of most human and animal pathogens. However, most molecular protocols rely on reagents that need to be transported and stored at a freezing temperature, a requirement that might affect their reliability in areas where the cold chain cannot be guaranteed. Over the years, several lyophilized molecular products have been marketed to circumvent this issue. We therefore evaluated the feasibility of replacing liquid reagents with freeze-dried formulations for the molecular diagnosis of avian influenza (AIV) and rabies (RABV) viruses, two priority zoonotic pathogens widely spread in Sub-Saharan Africa. Among six different commercial freeze-dried kits, we selected one reagent due to its easy-to-use features, single-reaction format, and preliminary performance assessment. Through a more in-depth evaluation, we determined its analytical and diagnostic performance and formulation stability and obtained results comparable to those of standard liquid master mixes. However, for the detection of divergent lyssaviruses, the lyophilized reagent's sensitivity was affected by suboptimal complementarity between the oligonucleotides and target sequences. Finally, a multi-site evaluation in four veterinary diagnostic laboratories located in Sub-Saharan Africa demonstrated the successful deployment of AIV and RABV assays utilizing the freeze-dried reagent, which can interchangeably replace liquid qRT-PCR/RT-PCR kits. Altogether, our results indicate that the investigated lyophilized master mix represents a valid alternative to liquid reagents for the molecular diagnosis of avian influenza and rabies and has the potential for broader applications to other relevant infectious diseases upon proper validation.IMPORTANCEMolecular diagnostic protocols rely on reagents that need to be transported and stored at freezing temperatures. Meeting this requirement can be challenging in areas where the maintenance of the cold chain is not guaranteed, such as in Sub-Saharan Africa. Our study aimed to assess the feasibility of using lyophilized reagents as a replacement for liquid reagents in the molecular diagnosis of two widespread zoonotic pathogens in Sub-Saharan Africa, namely, avian influenza and rabies. To accomplish this, we selected a commercially available lyophilized reagent based on its format and performance characteristics. We conducted a laboratory validation to assess the use of the lyophilized reagent throughout the entire diagnostic process. We also conducted a reproducibility test involving African laboratories as potential end-users. Our findings confirm that the lyophilized reagent can replace traditional liquid reagents to diagnose rabies and avian influenza and suggest its possible use for a wider range of infectious diseases after undergoing appropriate validation.

Indexed as

Influenza A virusInfluenza in BirdsMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesRabiesRabies virusReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionAfrica South of the SaharaAnimalsBirdsFreeze DryingHumansReagent Kits, DiagnosticReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityReagent Kits, Diagnosticavian influenzalyophilized reagentmolecular methodsrabiesRT-PCR

Identifiers

PMID40590553
PMCPMC12345159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.