ArticleDermatology reports2026
The suitability of mesenchymal stem cells for treating immune-mediated inflammatory skin diseases: a systematic review.
Article in Dermatology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy holds promise for treating immune-mediated inflammatory skin diseases (IMIDs), particularly when conventional therapies are ineffective. Encouraged by their immunomodulatory capabilities and potential for disease modification, different clinical trials are investigating the efficacy and safety of MSCs in single IMIDs. This review aims to summarize the application of MSCs in IMIDs and explore their future clinical potential. We reviewed published studies from January 2016 to January 2024 on MSC treatment for IMIDs. We retrieved 18 clinical trials and 5 observational studies, encompassing 609 patients with psoriasis, atopic dermatitis (AD), chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), alopecia areata (AA), systemic sclerosis (SSc), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Improvements or complete remission were observed in up to 100% of cases for AA, SSc, and SLE, though complete remission rates were less frequent than improvement rates, ranging from 0% in AD to 50% in CSU. Adverse events (AEs) were generally mild; moderate-severe AEs were uncommon (4% in psoriasis, 2.6% in SLE, and 0.7% in SSc), and deaths from all causes were rare (6 patients with SSc and 15 patients with SLE). In conclusion, MSC therapy shows promising results in terms of at least partial clinical improvement for most IMIDs. Its effect is achievable after a single or a few administrations, with no significant toxicity. MSCs may fulfill an unmet need for patients unresponsive to conventional immunomodulating agents. However, most evidence still comes from clinical trials with heterogeneous designs and endpoints. Future larger controlled trials are needed to better elucidate their role in refractory IMIDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.