ReviewEuropean heart journal2025
Refractory angina: mechanisms and stratified treatment in obstructive and non-obstructive chronic myocardial ischaemic syndromes.
Review in European heart journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Myocardial ischemia: no supply/demand mismatch but reduced blood flow per beat.Basic research in cardiology · 2026Review
- Coronary Sinus Reduction for REDUCER-I Patients With Refractory Angina and Angiographically Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Unmet Need to Verify Coronary Artery Spasm in Patients with Chronic or Acute Coronary Syndrome and Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Case Report: Recurrent ventricular fibrillation induced by multivessel coronary artery spasm: a case supporting ICD for secondary prevention.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Prospective evaluation of spinal cord stimulation in refractory angina: insights from a single-center cohort.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The diagnosis of refractory angina has conventionally been limited to patients with angina and ischaemia secondary to obstructive atherosclerotic epicardial coronary disease who experience persistent symptoms despite optimal pharmacological and revascularization therapies. It is now well-established that angina may also be caused by ischaemia resulting from coronary microcirculatory disorders, coronary vasospasm, and bridging in the absence of obstructive epicardial coronary disease or after "successful" revascularization. This increasingly prevalent and symptomatic group of patients, with both angina and demonstrable ischaemia, have been excluded from the conventional definition of refractory angina. In patients with obstructive epicardial coronary disease, disturbed microcirculatory and vasomotor function, amongst other ischaemic mechanisms, may account for continuing symptoms despite revascularization. Under-recognition of these mechanisms results in inadequate treatment and symptom persistence. In this review, a redefinition of refractory angina is proposed to include the full spectrum of patients experiencing persistent angina despite current maximal guideline-directed medical and revascularization therapies. Systematic approaches for comprehensive investigation are suggested to identify underlying mechanisms of ischaemia and stratify treatments accordingly. The complex needs of patients with refractory angina are likely best addressed by an inter-disciplinary Angina Heart Team with the aim of improving patient symptoms, quality of life, and clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.