Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40590502›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2026

The Association Between Product Attributes and Oral Nicotine Pouch Preference-Evidence From Online Stores.

Andrew Hardin, Sooa Ahn, Shaoying Ma, Veronica Thai, Micah Berman, Darren Mays, Jian Chen, Electra D Paskett, Theodore L Wagener, Ce Shang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Preventive medicine reports · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Instagram Memes of Oral Nicotine Pouches: Content Analysis Study.Online journal of public health informatics · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrew HardinDepartment of Neuroscience, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
Sooa AhnCenter for Tobacco Research, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH.ORCID 0009-0000-6209-5146
Shaoying MaCenter for Tobacco Research, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH.ORCID 0000-0002-6086-0622
Veronica ThaiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Micah BermanDivision of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.ORCID 0000-0002-0336-1317
Darren MaysCenter for Tobacco Research, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH.ORCID 0000-0002-6605-0743
Jian ChenDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Electra D PaskettDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Theodore L WagenerCenter for Tobacco Research, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH.
Ce ShangCenter for Tobacco Research, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH.ORCID 0000-0002-8838-4250

Funding

The Ohio State University Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (OSU-TCORS)U54CA287392 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Peter G. Shields, Theodore Lee Wagener · 2023 to 2026
$19.5M
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Tobacco ProductsNational Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH)NCI NIH HHS U54 CA287392Pelotonia Fellowship 6/1/2022-5/31/2024Rutgers Center of Excellence in Rapid Surveillance of Tobacco U01CA278695The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center (OSUCCC)The Ohio State University Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science U54CA287392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOral nicotine pouches (ONPs) have steadily gained popularity since first appearing in the US market during 2014, but research on how their features are associated with consumer preference remains limited. We examined how ONP characteristics, including prices, flavors, pouches per can, nicotine concentration, and ingredient claims, are associated with online ratings (1-5 stars), which measured consumer preferences in our analysis. AIMS AND

methodsData on 1689 unique ONPs from 19 brands that received reviews were scraped from 4 online stores that shipped to the United States, and we used ordinary least squares regressions to estimate associations between product features and ratings.

resultsOn average, products cost $0.20/pouch and contain 19 pouches/can. Nearly half (46%) had 5 to <10 mg nicotine/pouch. The most common flavors were "fruit/sweet" (33%), "mint" (25%), and "wintergreen" (13%), while 21% of products had "ice/freeze" mentions. The brand on! accounted for 15% of products. Nicotine claims included "tobacco-free" (21%), "leaf-free" (26%), "synthetic" (8%), and multiple claims (20%). Product size was associated with lower ratings, while mint flavor was associated with higher ratings (p < .05). Product characteristics were highly correlated with brands, and the negative association between price per pouch and ratings became insignificant after adjusting for brands.

conclusionsMore pouches per can are associated with lower ratings. Sales prices vary across ONP brands, which is related to how consumers rate more expensive products. Future research should investigate how restricting mint flavor, product size, and certain brands may impact consumer preferences for ONPs and their subsequent use. IMPLICATIONS: We provide novel evidence on how oral nicotine pouch (ONP) features are associated with consumer preferences, measured by online ratings (ranging from 1 to 5 stars). Larger product size (more pouches per can) is associated with lower consumer ratings, while mint flavor is associated with higher ratings. Brands are strongly correlated with ratings, impacting how consumers rate more expensive products. Restricting mint flavor, product size and certain brands may influence consumer preferences for ONPs and their subsequent use, which should be investigated in future research.

Indexed as

CommerceConsumer BehaviorNicotineTobacco ProductsAdministration, OralFlavoring AgentsHumansInternetUnited StatesFlavoring AgentsNicotine

Identifiers

PMID40590502
PMCPMC12914592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.