ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2026
The Association Between Product Attributes and Oral Nicotine Pouch Preference-Evidence From Online Stores.
Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surveillance of Cannabis Strains Using Online Data: Observational Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Observational
- Article
- Factors associated with considering switching to nicotine pouches among US adults who smoke.Drug and alcohol dependence reports · 2026Article
- Instagram Memes of Oral Nicotine Pouches: Content Analysis Study.Online journal of public health informatics · 2026Article
- Noninvasive Nicotine Quantitation and Flavor Differentiation ofACS omega · 2026Article
- Examining How Oral Nicotine Pouches Are Trending on TikTok: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Testing oral nicotine pouches versus nicotine replacement therapy for cigarette harm reduction in Appalachia: The ARISE study protocol.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionOral nicotine pouches (ONPs) have steadily gained popularity since first appearing in the US market during 2014, but research on how their features are associated with consumer preference remains limited. We examined how ONP characteristics, including prices, flavors, pouches per can, nicotine concentration, and ingredient claims, are associated with online ratings (1-5 stars), which measured consumer preferences in our analysis. AIMS AND
methodsData on 1689 unique ONPs from 19 brands that received reviews were scraped from 4 online stores that shipped to the United States, and we used ordinary least squares regressions to estimate associations between product features and ratings.
resultsOn average, products cost $0.20/pouch and contain 19 pouches/can. Nearly half (46%) had 5 to <10 mg nicotine/pouch. The most common flavors were "fruit/sweet" (33%), "mint" (25%), and "wintergreen" (13%), while 21% of products had "ice/freeze" mentions. The brand on! accounted for 15% of products. Nicotine claims included "tobacco-free" (21%), "leaf-free" (26%), "synthetic" (8%), and multiple claims (20%). Product size was associated with lower ratings, while mint flavor was associated with higher ratings (p < .05). Product characteristics were highly correlated with brands, and the negative association between price per pouch and ratings became insignificant after adjusting for brands.
conclusionsMore pouches per can are associated with lower ratings. Sales prices vary across ONP brands, which is related to how consumers rate more expensive products. Future research should investigate how restricting mint flavor, product size, and certain brands may impact consumer preferences for ONPs and their subsequent use. IMPLICATIONS: We provide novel evidence on how oral nicotine pouch (ONP) features are associated with consumer preferences, measured by online ratings (ranging from 1 to 5 stars). Larger product size (more pouches per can) is associated with lower consumer ratings, while mint flavor is associated with higher ratings. Brands are strongly correlated with ratings, impacting how consumers rate more expensive products. Restricting mint flavor, product size and certain brands may influence consumer preferences for ONPs and their subsequent use, which should be investigated in future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.