SynthesisJournal of advanced nursing2025
What Is Known About Family-Inclusive Inpatient Care From Patient and Family Perspectives? An Integrative Review.
Synthesis in Journal of advanced nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo synthesise understanding of family-inclusive adult inpatient care using systematic integrative literature review.
backgroundInclusion of the extended family network (termed whānau by Indigenous New Zealanders) in bedside care is a person-centred practice speaking to cultural diversity and aligning with principles of Indigenous inclusivity. Although patient-and-family/whānau-centred care is not new, feedback from patients, whānau and clinical audits indicates variability in providing whānau-inclusive care. DESIGN AND
methodsWe used an integrative literature review methodology to draw on qualitative and quantitative evidence published between 2000 and 2024. Five databases were systematically searched for eligible papers in January 2025, including MEDLINE (via Ovid), CINAHL Plus (via EBSCO), Web of Science, Scopus and PsycINFO (via Ovid) and quality assessment criteria were applied to included studies. Data were synthesised using thematic analysis.
resultsOf 5325 identified papers, 27 met the inclusion criteria. Thematic analysis yielded three themes that captured experiences of family/whānau inclusion in inpatient care, including factors that helped or hindered inclusion in an acute hospital setting: (1) culturally safe behaviours foster family-inclusive care, including relational care; (2) culturally unsafe behaviours and unwelcoming hospital environments hamper family inclusivity and (3) effective communication practices are variable, with poor communication described as a more common family/whānau experience.
conclusionThis comprehensive integrative review identified limited evidence about the experience of family/whānau inclusion in acute care. Inclusion was variable and dependent on health professional willingness, cultural acumen and environmental factors. Experiences were negatively influenced by perceived risks to effective care, including culturally unsafe care and environments and poor communication. The experiences of non-Māori are an underexplored element of family-inclusive care and warrant further investigation. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE: Greater understanding of patient and family/whānau bedside care experiences is critical to fostering family/whānau-inclusive inpatient care and evidence-based organisation-wide quality improvement worldwide. Findings have implications for how families are communicated with and integrated into care and for policies such as visiting hours. Professional training and policy work is needed to build health professionals' confidence in family-focused consultation, integration in care and logistical solutions to workload management. IMPACT: This integrative review synthesises patients' and family experiences of family-inclusive inpatient care and incorporates Indigenous/First Nations views as a unique contribution. This review highlights the need to embed cultural safety training into nursing workforce development to serve vulnerable and underserved populations better. Local organisational and broader policy changes are needed to allow flexibility with inpatient care to foster family inclusivity and improve inpatient care. CONTRIBUTION TO THE WIDER GLOBAL CLINICAL COMMUNITY: Indigenous-sensitive practices are an essential facilitator to accessing culturally responsive healthcare services and are key to serving vulnerable and underserved populations and fostering inclusion and equity in healthcare provision. Evidence synthesised by this review has provided insight into Indigenous views of family-centric care in Aotearoa. We note gaps in knowledge about views of Indigenous/First Nations populations globally in this context. REPORTING
methodFollowing the EQUATOR guidelines, the PRISMA-S checklist was applied. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution was made due to the literature review design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.