ArticleOrthodontics & craniofacial research2025
Low Tongue Posture Improvement Effect of Orofacial Myofunctional Therapy Comprehensive Study of Nasal Ventilation Condition Using Computational Fluid Dynamics and Dental Arch Morphology.
Article in Orthodontics & craniofacial research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesOral myofunctional therapy (OMFT) has been proposed as a potential treatment for improving low tongue posture (LTP) and alleviating obstructive sleep apnea. However, its effectiveness remains uncertain. This study aimed to quantify the effects of OMFT on LTP. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study analysed pre- and post-treatment cone-beam computed tomography images from 43 children with LTP treated with rapid maxillary expansion (RME) only (mean age: 9.09 years, no-OMFT group), 46 children with LTP treated with RME plus OMFT (mean age: 9.40 years, OMFT group), and 20 children (mean age: 9.87 years, control group). The primary outcomes measured were intraoral airway volume (an indicator of LTP), nasal airway pressure differences (assessed using computational fluid dynamics), and maxillary dental arch width. Comparisons were made among groups, with the frequency and relationship between these measures investigated.
resultsThere were no significant differences between OMFT and no-OMFT groups before treatment. Post-treatment, the OMFT group showed significantly smaller intraoral airway volume (0.66 cm
conclusionOMFT improves LTP and nasal airway obstruction. Improvements in nasal airway obstruction by OMFT are likely correlated with the observed improvements in LTP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.