ArticleAmerican journal of biological anthropology2025
Human, Animal, or Mineral? Ethical Considerations for Studies of Fossilized Hominin Remains.
Article in American journal of biological anthropology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Development of Recommendations for Legacy Anatomical Collections: A Tale of Two Approaches.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2026Article
- Human, Animal, or Mineral? Ethical Considerations for Studies of Fossilized Hominin Remains.American journal of biological anthropology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ethical considerations around research and education with modern human subjects, use of human tissue, and studies involving humans are ubiquitous within the global scientific community. This commentary explores considerations around how and whether these types of ethical considerations may apply to hominin fossils. While some might propose that the age of a fossil could be the basis for decisions around their ethical handling, it may be that characteristics or behaviors of the hominins are a more appropriate measure to determine their ethical status. These types of ethical considerations have recently been examined in other historical human tissues, such as mummies and ancient DNA, with these ethical explorations being driven by a recognition of evolving ethical perspectives around the world. Thus, there is both the precedent and stimulus for the paleoanthropology community to revisit current ethical practices within the profession. Doing so would help identify and establish standards that are reflective of global perspectives around the contemporary ethical management of hominin fossils, and potentially assist in aligning these practices with other disciplines that work with both hominin fossils and human tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.