ReviewThe Journal of animal ecology2025
Large-scale importance of bark beetle outbreaks for standing deadwood and woodpeckers.
Review in The Journal of animal ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Large-scale importance of bark beetle outbreaks for standing deadwood and woodpeckers.The Journal of animal ecology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Resource pulses associated with forest disturbances can significantly influence biological communities, with interacting and sometimes lagged effects on species numbers. Among the most common disturbances in temperate forests are bark beetle outbreaks, which represent a resource pulse and initiate additional resource pulses of other insects and of deadwood. Moreover, bark beetle outbreaks are often followed by changes in habitat conditions due to canopy cover loss or salvage logging that can have contrasting effects on co-occurring forest species. However, the effects of this multi-resource pulse on forest species have rarely been quantified simultaneously. Here, we investigated if and to what extent changes in woodpecker population density were related to resource pulses, specifically spruce bark beetle and standing dead wood of Norway spruce. We used data from long-term monitoring projects collected across Switzerland from 1984 to 2020 to build a network model that estimated relationships among species and resources. We built a semi-mechanistic model that included structured equations of parameters of interest. The equations modelled Norway spruce standing deadwood volume, bark beetle density and density of three woodpecker species as a function of their interactions, as well as climatic, environmental and management variables. The model allowed both same-year and 1-year lagged effects. We found weak relationships between bark beetle outbreaks and woodpecker densities, and strong positive relationships between deadwood amount and woodpecker densities. In turn, standing deadwood was strongly linked to bark beetle outbreaks, highlighting the indirect role of bark beetles in promoting woodpecker populations by means of providing deadwood for foraging and nesting. Salvage logging, that is, the removal of trees infested by bark beetles, had only minor effects on bark beetles. Bark beetle outbreaks contributed to the generation of deadwood that ensured the continuity of its associated ecosystem functions, which benefited woodpeckers and, potentially, forest biodiversity as a whole. Large-scale consequences of these multi-resource pulses were reflected by species populations over longer time periods than the pulses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.