ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2025
Modulation of pain sensitivity by tDCS using different anodal connector locations: a single-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled study.
Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) depends on various stimulation parameters. With rectangular electrodes, the location of the wire connector may affect the electrical field relative to the underlying target area. Here, we examined longitudinal changes in pain sensitivity and GABA levels in response to tDCS using standard rectangular (5 × 7 cm) electrodes and two different anodal connector locations. Methods: In this single-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled study, 53 healthy volunteers were assigned to one of 4 groups, receiving either real tDCS or sham tDCS, with the anodal connector oriented either superior-medially or ventral-laterally. tDCS was delivered on 5 consecutive days with the anode and cathode placed over the left primary sensorimotor cortex (SM1) and the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, respectively. Pain detection thresholds (PT) and moderate pain thresholds (MPT) of the right index finger and GABA levels from the bilateral SM1 were obtained prior to tDCS, after 5 tDCS sessions, and after 6 weeks. Results: Superior-medial oriented tDCS significantly increased both pain thresholds at day 5 and at 6 weeks, whereas ventral-lateral oriented tDCS or sham tDCS did not. At day 5, MPT was significantly increased when comparing superior-medial oriented tDCS with sham tDCS. At week 6, both thresholds were significantly increased when comparing superior-medial oriented tDCS with ventral-lateral oriented tDCS and MPT was also increased when comparing superior-medial oriented tDCS with sham tDCS. GABA levels did not differ between time-points or between groups and no association was found between baseline GABA levels in the stimulated hemisphere and change in pain thresholds. Conclusions: tDCS-induced long-lasting changes in pain sensitivity may depend on the location of the wire connector when using a rectangular anode. A greater pain modulatory effect may be induced when the connector is aligned superior-medially along the central sulcus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.