ArticlePCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences2025
Validity of nursing interventions for aggressive behavior in neurodevelopmental disorders in child and adolescent psychiatry: A modified e-Delphi study.
Article in PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Validity of nursing interventions for aggressive behavior in neurodevelopmental disorders in child and adolescent psychiatry: A modified e-Delphi study.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) are the most common diagnosis among pediatric and adolescent psychiatric inpatients in Japan. However, there is limited evidence regarding nursing care for hospitalized children with NDDs. This study aimed to establish nursing care guidelines for children with NDDs hospitalized for aggressive behaviors. Methods: The draft of the guidelines was based on qualitative content analysis of interviews with nurses. It was revised to ensure content validity through discussions with multidisciplinary experts in child and adolescent psychiatry. A three-round Delphi survey was conducted among nurses from child and adolescent psychiatric wards across Japan to reach consensus on the guidelines. Results: Sixty-two nurses participated in the final survey. The agreement criterion was set to 80% to improve the content validity of the items. The survey identified 19 guideline items across five domains: "Giving children a sense of security and safety regarding nurses and hospital life," "Helping children reflect on and verbalize the situation and feelings they experience when engaging in aggressive behavior based on a sense of safety and security," "Supporting children's motivation to change their behavior by helping them understand the inappropriateness and disadvantages of aggressive behavior," "After motivating children, assisting them in setting specific behavioral goals to drive change," and "Supporting children in establishing appropriate behavior to achieve their behavioral goals." Conclusion: These guidelines achieved a strong consensus and demonstrated content validity and value for inpatient treatment of children with NDDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.