Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40589972›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Deep learning for enhanced prediction of diabetic retinopathy: a comparative study on the diabetes complications data set.

Weijun Gong, You Pu, Tiao Ning, Yan Zhu, Gui Mu, Jing Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Weijun GongSchool of Mathematics Kunming University, Kunming University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
You PuDepartment of Rehabilitation, Baoshan People's Hospital, Baoshan, Yunnan, China.
Tiao NingEngineering Research Center for Urban Modern Agriculture of Higher Education in Yunnan Province, School of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kunming University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Yan ZhuSchool of Mathematics Kunming University, Kunming University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Gui MuSchool of Mathematics Kunming University, Kunming University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Jing LiEngineering Research Center for Urban Modern Agriculture of Higher Education in Yunnan Province, School of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kunming University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening faces critical challenges in early detection due to its asymptomatic onset and the limitations of conventional prediction models. While existing studies predominantly focus on image-based AI diagnosis, there is a pressing need for accurate risk prediction using structured clinical data. The purpose of this study was to develop, compare, and validate models for predicting retinopathy in diabetic patients via five traditional statistical models and deep learning models. Methods: On the basis of 3,000 data points from the Diabetes Complications Data Set of the National Center for Population Health Sciences Data, the differences in the characteristics of patients with diabetes mellitus and diabetes combined with retinopathy were statistically analyzed using SPSS software. Five traditional machine learning models and a model based on deep neural networks (DNNs) were used to train models to assess retinopathy in diabetic patients. Results: Deep learning-based prediction models outperformed traditional machine learning models, namely logistic regression, decision tree, naive Bayes, random forest, and support vector machine, on all the datasets and performed better in predicting retinopathy in diabetic patients (accuracy, 0.778 vs. 0.753, 0.630, 0.718, 0.758, 0.776, respectively; F1 score, 0.776 vs. 0.751, 0.602, 0.724, 0.755, 0.776, respectively; AUC, 0.833 vs. 0.822, 0.631, 0.769, 0.829, 0.831, respectively). To enhance the interpretability of the deep learning model, SHAP analysis was employed to assess feature importance and provide insights into the key drivers of retinopathy prediction. Conclusion: Deep learning models can accurately predict retinopathy in diabetic patients. The findings of this study can be used for prevention and monitoring by allocating resources to high-risk patients.

Indexed as

deep learning modeldiabetic retinopathymachine learningmodel comparisonprediction models

Identifiers

PMID40589972
PMCPMC12206824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.