ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2025
How People with COPD Perceive and Communicate Exacerbations: A Multicountry Survey Study.
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- COPD Exacerbation Recognition Tool: Translation, Linguistic, and Cross-Cultural Validation.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Can Patient Education Lead the Way? Head-To-Head Comparison of EXACT and CERT for Early Recognition of Acute COPD Exacerbations.Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Objective: Exacerbations negatively impact quality of life of people living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and can accelerate disease progression. Studies suggest that patients find it difficult to recognize exacerbations and, therefore, under-report exacerbations. We aimed to understand how people living with COPD perceive and communicate their experiences of exacerbations. Methods: A cross-sectional survey including one open-ended question was developed using a targeted literature review, with input from patients and clinicians. People diagnosed with COPD were recruited from online consumer research panels in Brazil, China, France, Spain, UK, and USA and completed the survey. Responses were described overall and in specific subgroups; thematic analysis was used for the open-ended question. Results: Of 857 respondents (median age 58 years; 50.5% male), 623 (72.7%) reported daily shortness of breath; 417 (48.7%) that daily symptoms changed "a little". In the open-ended question, exacerbations were described through a narrative lens detailing subjective experiences of symptoms, their management, potential causes, and emotions felt during exacerbations, with no single preferred term. In the 671 (78.3%) respondents who reported ever having an exacerbation, these were identified as symptoms being "worse than usual" (52.8%) or because respondents had "more trouble than usual with daily activities" (50.1%). Conclusion: While people living with COPD report confidence in their ability to identify exacerbations, there is a disconnect between their experience of exacerbations and the language and definitions used in clinical practice. A discussion guide emphasizing the use of plain language could improve communication between healthcare providers and patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.