ArticleERJ open research2025
Development and validation of a diagnostic prediction model for heart failure-related pleural effusions: the BANCA score.
Article in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeted detection of amino acid profiles in pleural fluid and serum by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for estimating the risks of four aetiologies of pleural effusion: a proof-of-concept study.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Biochemistry-based machine learning algorithms in differentiating pleural effusion: current status and perspective.ERJ open research · 2026Review
- Revisiting Light's criteria: a validated blood-free triple combination matches diagnostic accuracy in over 7000 patients.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Methodological Review of Classification Trees for Risk Stratification: An Application Example in the Obesity Paradox.Nutrients · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Heart failure (HF) is a common cause of pleural effusion (PE); however, its diagnosis can be challenging owing to overlapping clinical features with other causes. Measuring N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels is diagnostically useful, but the optimal cut-off point must be determined. This study aimed to optimise NT-proBNP cut-offs for diagnosing HF-related PEs and develop a scoring model to improve diagnostic precision. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 2005 patients with PEs, who were divided into derivation and validation cohorts. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified the optimal cut-off point for NT-proBNP in pleural fluid and serum. A scoring system was developed based on logistic regression (TRIPOD statement) that included both clinical and laboratory variables. Its diagnostic accuracy was compared with that of existing methods using the area under the curve (AUC). Results: NT-proBNP ≥2500 pg·mL Conclusions: The BANCA score is a reliable tool for diagnosing HF-related PEs, offering superior accuracy compared with conventional methods. It is particularly useful for identifying cardiac effusions that are misclassified using traditional criteria.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.