ArticleERJ open research2025
Feasibility of using continuous positive airway pressure
Article in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is a well-established treatment modality for children in moderate and severe respiratory failure in well-resourced settings. However, the availability of CPAP is generally poor in many resource-limited settings, in large part because existing CPAP devices are not designed for cost and resource efficiency, which precludes their use. The LeVe CPAP System has been co-developed by an international multidisciplinary team specifically for use in low-resource settings. In this paper we report the first study evaluating the efficacy of using the LeVe CPAP System as an intervention for children with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure at Mengo Hospital in Kampala, Uganda. Methods: A total of 42 paediatric patients were recruited onto the study, all of whom were failing to maintain oxygen saturation above 88% at room conditions. Key clinical measures, including oxygen saturation, heart rate, respiratory rate and dyspnoea were recorded every hour for the length of admission on the paediatric ward. Results: At completion, 39 patients had recovered and were successfully discharged while 3 of 42 (7%) died in the early phases of treatment. Surviving patients showed improvements in all clinical measures, particularly in the first 12 h of treatment, and no adverse effects were reported after continued use. Additionally, we interviewed five parents whose children were undergoing treatment to gain a qualitative assessment of perceptions to the LeVe CPAP System. Conclusion: Outcomes of the study demonstrate the capability of the LeVe CPAP System to treat paediatric patients in respiratory failure and support the system's wider adoption in low-resource settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.