ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2025
CNN-BiLSTM and DC-IGN fusion model and piecewise exponential attenuation optimization: an innovative approach to improve EEG emotion recognition performance.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adaptive frequency band attention-guided CNN-BiLSTM for Spatial-Spectral-Temporal EEG emotion recognition.Brain informatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
EEG emotion recognition has important applications in human-computer interaction and mental health assessment, but existing models have limitations in capturing the complex spatial and temporal features of EEG signals. To overcome this problem, we propose an innovative model that combines CNN-BiLSTM and DC-IGN and fused both outputs for sentiment classification via a fully connected layer. In addition, we use a piecewise exponential decay strategy to optimize the training process. We conducted a comprehensive comparative experiment on the SEED and DEAP datasets, it includes traditional models, existing advanced models, and different combination models (such as CNN + LSTM, CNN + LSTM+DC-IGN). The results show that our model achieves 94.35% accuracy on SEED dataset, 89.84% on DEAP-valence, 90.31% on DEAP-arousal, which is significantly better than other models. In addition, we further verified the superiority of the model through subject independent experiment and learning rate scheduling strategy comparison experiment. These results not only improve the performance of EEG emotion recognition, but also provide new ideas and methods for research in related fields, and prove the significant advantages of our model in capturing complex features and improving classification accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.