Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40589734›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025

The role of innate immune responses against two strains of PEDV (S INDEL and non-S INDEL) in newborn and weaned piglets inoculated by combined orogastric and intranasal routes.

C López-Figueroa, E Cano, N Navarro, M Pérez, R López, K Skovgaard, H Vorsholt, P M H Heegaard, J Vergara-Alert, J Segalés

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

C López-FigueroaUnitat Mixta d'Investigació Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries - Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (IRTA-UAB) en Sanitat Animal, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain.
E CanoUnitat Mixta d'Investigació Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries - Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (IRTA-UAB) en Sanitat Animal, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain.
N NavarroUnitat Mixta d'Investigació Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries - Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (IRTA-UAB) en Sanitat Animal, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain.
M PérezUnitat Mixta d'Investigació Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries - Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (IRTA-UAB) en Sanitat Animal, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain.
R LópezUnitat Mixta d'Investigació Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries - Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (IRTA-UAB) en Sanitat Animal, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain.
K SkovgaardDepartment of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Lyngby, Denmark.
H VorsholtDepartment of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Lyngby, Denmark.
P M H HeegaardDepartment of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Lyngby, Denmark.
J Vergara-Alert *Unitat Mixta d'Investigació Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries - Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (IRTA-UAB) en Sanitat Animal, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain.
J Segalés *Unitat Mixta d'Investigació Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries - Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (IRTA-UAB) en Sanitat Animal, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED) is a severe gastrointestinal disease in swine caused by PED virus (PEDV), leading to significant economic losses worldwide. Newborn piglets are especially vulnerable, with nearly 100% mortality, unlike older pigs. Disease severity also varies depending on the PEDV strain, with non-S INDEL strains being more virulent than S INDEL ones. Methods: This study examined early pathogenesis and innate immunity in 5-day-old suckling and 5-week-old weaned piglets (n=8 per age group, 4 per strain) inoculated with S INDEL or non-S INDEL PEDV strains via combined orogastric and intranasal route. Age matched negative controls (n=3 per age group) were included. Body weight, temperature, and clinical signs were monitored for 48 hours post-inoculation (hpi). PEDV RNA levels were assessed in rectal swabs (RS) at 0 and 48 hpi, while pathological analyses and viral RNA loads were measured in jejunal content and intestinal mucosa. Gene expression of 75 selected antiviral and inflammatory genes were determined in laser capture microdissection (LCM)-derived jejunal samples using microfluidic qPCR at 48 hpi. Results: Suckling piglets showed severe clinical signs, while weaned piglets were mostly asymptomatic at 48 hpi. In general, clinical signs and lesions in suckling piglets were similar, regardless of the PEDV strain. Both viral strains produced comparable viral RNA loads in the small intestine and feces, as well as consistent villous atrophy and fusion across age groups. In LCM-derived jejunal samples, weaned piglets had higher expression of antiviral genes (type I/III interferons, ISGs) and Th1/Th17 pro-inflammatory genes, particularly with the non-S INDEL strain. Conversely, the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 was overexpressed in suckling compared to weaned piglets for both strains. Discussion: Overall, PEDV-induced intestinal damage, viral replication, and excretion were similar in studied groups regardless of viral strain or piglet age. The reduced clinical severity in weaned piglets may result from their stronger intestinal antiviral and pro-inflammatory response.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsImmunity, InnatePorcine epidemic diarrhea virusSwine DiseasesAdministration, IntranasalAnimalsAnimals, NewbornSwineViral LoadWeaningage-related diseaseimmunopathogenesisinnate immune responseinterferons or IFNinterferon-stimulated genes or ISGsnon-S INDEL strainporcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV)S INDEL strain

Identifiers

PMID40589734
PMCPMC12206634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.