ArticleBiomedical reports2025
Changes in chronic rhinosinusitis: A retrospective analysis of computed tomography imaging and inflammatory changes either side of a 5-year interval.
Article in Biomedical reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) remains a prevalent and challenging condition characterized by variable clinical presentations and severity. The present study investigated changes in CRS characteristics either side of a 5-year interval to understand the impact of clinical advancements on disease management. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 120 patients diagnosed with CRS in 2017 and 2023 at The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University (Taiyuan, Chian). Standardized computed tomography imaging was performed, and sinonasal inflammation severity was evaluated using Lund-Mackay (LM) scores. Comparative analyses focused on anatomical variations, mucosal and submucosal features, and patterns of inflammation. Significant reductions in LM scores were observed in 2023 compared with those in 2017, indicating decreased sinonasal inflammation severity. Improvements were most pronounced in the osteomeatal complex (OMC) and frontal sinuses, with asymmetrical changes between the left and right sides. The left OMC and frontal sinus exhibited greater reductions in inflammation, whereas the right side showed less pronounced improvements. Analysis of mucosal thickening revealed a shift from diffuse to localized patterns, with reduced submucosal remodeling and fewer signs of chronic osteitis observed in 2023 compared with that in 2017. Anatomical variations, such as middle turbinate pneumatization and nasal septum deviation, remained unchanged between the two cohorts. This stability suggests that the observed reduction in disease severity may be more likely related to external factors such as earlier detection or evolving clinical practice, rather than anatomical differences. In conclusion, over the past 5 years, a marked reduction in CRS severity has been observed, particularly in regions critical for sinus ventilation and drainage. These findings may reflect broader changes in clinical practice over time, such as increased disease awareness, improved access to diagnostic tools or shifts in general management approaches, although specific treatment strategies or time of presentation were not directly assessed. The results also highlighting persistent asymmetry and inter-sinus variability. Further prospective studies integrating advanced imaging and molecular techniques are needed to improve understanding of these time trends and refine diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in CRS care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.