Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40589713›Full record

ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2025

Early and Late Application of Skin Homograft in Management of Major Burn Patients: A Comparative Study.

M A Megahed, H R A Elkhouly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M A MegahedDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shibin Al Kawm, Menoufia, Egypt.
H R A ElkhoulyDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Damietta Specialized Hospital, Damietta, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our objective is to compare the effect of early and late application of skin homograft regarding complications and mortality rate. Burn is a type of physical trauma to skin or tissue. Burn can lead to loss of skin, resulting in deep, widespread skin wounds or even death. This prospective comparative study was done at the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department of Menoufia University Hospitals from December 2017 to July 2020. It was conducted on 31 patients with major burns, classified into two main groups: the early homograft group (8 patients) and the late homograft group (23 patients). All studied patients and donors were subjected to a full history, general and local examination, and investigations such as complete blood counts (CBC), blood glucose level, kidney and liver function tests, electrolytes, and coagulation profile. Additionally, pre-operative preparation along with intra-operative and post-operative care were done. There was a significant decrease in temperature, HR, RR, SIRS score, TLC and K measurements, along with a decrease in rejection % and LOS (length of hospital stay) in the early homograft group compared to the late homograft group (p < 0.05 respectively). Additionally, there was a significant increase in albumin and Na measurements (p < 0.05, respectively). The use of homograft in major burn patients improved their overall condition by improving laboratory and respiratory data post-operatively. However, early usage of the homograft, especially in the first three days, improved laboratory data, SIRS score, percentage of rejection, and length of hospital stay.

Indexed as

burnearly and late applicationhomograft

Identifiers

PMID40589713
PMCPMC12186150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.