ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2025
Early and Late Application of Skin Homograft in Management of Major Burn Patients: A Comparative Study.
Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our objective is to compare the effect of early and late application of skin homograft regarding complications and mortality rate. Burn is a type of physical trauma to skin or tissue. Burn can lead to loss of skin, resulting in deep, widespread skin wounds or even death. This prospective comparative study was done at the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department of Menoufia University Hospitals from December 2017 to July 2020. It was conducted on 31 patients with major burns, classified into two main groups: the early homograft group (8 patients) and the late homograft group (23 patients). All studied patients and donors were subjected to a full history, general and local examination, and investigations such as complete blood counts (CBC), blood glucose level, kidney and liver function tests, electrolytes, and coagulation profile. Additionally, pre-operative preparation along with intra-operative and post-operative care were done. There was a significant decrease in temperature, HR, RR, SIRS score, TLC and K measurements, along with a decrease in rejection % and LOS (length of hospital stay) in the early homograft group compared to the late homograft group (p < 0.05 respectively). Additionally, there was a significant increase in albumin and Na measurements (p < 0.05, respectively). The use of homograft in major burn patients improved their overall condition by improving laboratory and respiratory data post-operatively. However, early usage of the homograft, especially in the first three days, improved laboratory data, SIRS score, percentage of rejection, and length of hospital stay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40589713PMC12186150What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.