ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2025
Nano Fat Therapy and Platelet Rich Plasma Versus Nano Fat Therapy Alone on Burn Scar.
Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to identify the efficacy of platelet rich plasma plus nano fat therapy in comparison to nano fat therapy alone on burn scars. The study was conducted at the Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Dr. Ruth KM Pfau, Civil Hospital Karachi, Dow University of Health Sciences Pakistan from March 2021 to February 2022. Sixty-four patients with mature burn scar of both genders aged eighteen and above were included and randomly distributed in 2 groups: one group received treatment with nano fat therapy whereas the other group received treatment with nano fat therapy and platelet rich plasma. Vancouver scar scale (VSS) score was used to assess the scar at baseline, 1 month, 3 months and finally after 6 months. For both groups, the highest mean total VSS score values were observed at baseline and lowest at 6 months. All mean values at various points for the PRP + nano fat group were lower than mean values for the nano fat group. However, the mean difference between the two groups for scores after 6 months was insignificant. It was concluded that results of both treatments are equivocal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40589711PMC12186185What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.