ArticleHealth science reports2025
Evaluation of Emotion Recognition in Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorder: Recommended Designs for Future Studies.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Testing the relationships between facial emotion recognition, levels of Autistic traits, and eye gaze patterns.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Diagnosing autism spectrum disorder based on eye tracking technology using deep learning models.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a lifetime neurodevelopmental condition, which its prevalence is on the rise. Difficulties with emotion recognition and perspective-taking are commonly observed in individuals with ASD, leading to a profound impact on their daily functions. The aim of this document was to offer a reflective perspective on the evolution of research in this area. Methods: This document evaluates current research approaches. The analysis focused on identifying key trends, gaps, and areas for further investigations. Results: Most studies that examined emotional face recognition in individuals with ASD yielded mixed findings regarding their ability in recognizing specific types of emotions. It may be considered that the heterogeneous population as well as the stimuli or experimental designs in previous studies play pivotal roles in inconsistencies in findings. Conclusion: This commentary critically reflects on the previous studies, highlights trends in the current literature, and suggests how assessments can be implemented in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.