ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces2025
Principle of Stimulated Raman Scattering Microscopy: Emerging at High Spatiotemporal Limits.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Illuminating aging with multimodal optical metabolic imaging.Science advances · 2026Review
- Far-field single-molecule vibrational spectroscopy and imaging.Chemical science · 2026Review
- Quantum theory of stimulated Raman scattering microscopy.Chemical physics reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy has revolutionized chemical bond imaging, particularly in biomedicine. However, since its invention in 2008, the theoretical underpinnings of its exceptional sensitivity-surpassing conventional Raman microscopy-have remained largely unexplored. While empirical advancements have driven its success in the following decade, a quantitative understanding of why SRS microscopy performs so effectively has been lacking. This Perspective addresses the knowledge gaps and misconceptions in the field, offering a fundamental theoretical framework for SRS microscopy. Building on recent quantum electrodynamics treatments, we analyze the absolute detection limits of Raman microscopy using a spatiotemporal diagram. Our analysis reveals that spontaneous Raman scattering and stimulated Raman scattering occupy complementary spatiotemporal domains, with the crossover boundary aligning with the length and time scales relevant to bioimaging. Our first-principles theory demonstrates that SRS excels in high spatiotemporal regimes, explaining its unparalleled ability to image chemical bonds, which inherently demand high spatial and temporal resolution. Furthermore, we clarify that SRS spectroscopy and SRS microscopy, though rooted in the same SRS process, operate on distinct principles, serve different purposes, and should not be viewed as natural extensions of one another.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.