ArticleJournal of inflammation research2025
Machine Learning and Experimental Validation Reveal MYH11 as a Novel Prognostic Biomarker and Therapeutic Target in Bladder Cancer.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Bladder cancer (BCa) is one of the top ten most common cancers, yet its underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This study aimed to explore the potential molecular mechanisms of BCa using multi-omics and single-cell analysis. Methods: First, differential analysis of transcriptome data related to BCa from public databases was performed, and a risk model was then developed using 101 different machine learning algorithms to determine prognostic genes, followed by independent prognostic analysis to construct a nomogram. Immune infiltration analysis was performed to explore the impact of prognostic genes on the tumor microenvironment. Metabolomics, proteomics, and post-translational modification data from BCa tumor and adjacent non-tumor tissues were used to explore the relationships between prognostic genes and various omics levels. Finally, single-cell analysis identified key cells involved in BCa pathogenesis, and in vitro experiments validated the expression and function of key genes. Results: The risk model constructed by 8 prognostic genes identified using 101 algorithms effectively predicted the survival outcomes of BCa patients. Furthermore, risk scores, pathological T stage, and pathological N stage were confirmed as independent prognostic factors for the nomogram construction. Interestingly, high-risk patients showed a significantly lower response to PD-L1 treatment, with higher TIDE scores. Omics analysis revealed a close relationship between prognostic genes and proteomics, metabolomics, and post-translational modifications. Specifically, FLNC and MYH11 may influence BCa progression through phosphorylation and succinylation. Single-cell analysis identified fibroblasts as key cells in BCa. Functional experiments showed that MYH11 knockdown promoted cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. Conclusion: This study identified 8 prognostic genes to construct a risk model, and suggest that MYH11 is a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for BCa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.