Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40589532›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025

Modified T-plate internal fixation in the treatment of medial malleolus fractures of the distal tibia in the elderly.

Xipeng Wang, Kun Nie, Jiangtao Liu, Cong Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xipeng WangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Kun NieDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Jiangtao LiuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Cong JiangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of modified T-plate internal fixation vs. conventional cannulated lag screws in treating medial malleolus fractures of the distal tibia in elderly patients, with a focus on surgical outcomes, functional recovery, and complication profiles. Methods: A prospective cohort analysis was conducted on a sample of 46 elderly patients (aged ≥ 60 years) with isolated medial malleolus fractures treated at a single orthopedic center between April 2020 and December 2022. Patients were allocated to either modified T-plate internal fixation ( Results: The modified T-plate group exhibited significantly superior early functional recovery, with higher AOFAS ankle and hindfoot score at 3 months (63.5 ± 8.0 vs. 55.3 ± 13.3, Conclusion: Modified T-plate fixation has been shown to facilitate early functional rehabilitation in elderly patients with distal tibial medial malleolus fractures. Although this method requires marginally longer operative time, it offers equivalent long-term outcomes and safety to traditional lag screws internal fixation. Notably, it is particularly advantageous for osteoporotic patients, as it addresses the challenges posed by bone fragility and compromised healing capacity.

Indexed as

cannulated lag screwsinternal fixation surgerylong-term rehabilitationmodified T-platetibia fracture

Identifiers

PMID40589532
PMCPMC12206814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.