ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Nomogram-based risk prediction model employing serum biomarkers to assess intestinal injury risk in patients with metabolic syndrome.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS) are more likely to have intestinal injury that may accelerate the disease process. We developed a risk prediction model for the non-invasive, rapid, and accurate assessment of intestinal injury in patients with MetS based on serum biomarkers. Methods: Patients with MetS who underwent colonoscopy were enrolled in this study. Based on the results of the colonoscopy, the participants were divided into the intestinal injury and non-intestinal injury groups. Blood samples were collected to detect laboratory indicators and quantify serum biomarkers. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to identify predictors of intestinal injury in patients with MetS and to construct a nomogram-based risk prediction model. We employed bootstrapping and 5-fold cross-validation to validate the model internally, with the area under the curve (AUC) used to assess the predictive efficacy, the calibration curve utilized to evaluate the calibration degree, and decision curve analysis (DCA) used to evaluate the clinical practicability of the model. Results: The study included 263 participants. Our multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that clinical features such as age, body mass index, neutrophil percentage, as well as serum biomarkers including diamine oxidase and lipopolysaccharide, were predictive factors for intestinal injury in patients with MetS. The model had strong repeatability (bootstrap method: precision: 0.873, 5-fold cross-validation: AUC: 0.948 ± 0.012), differentiation (AUC: 0.957), and accuracy (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ Conclusions: Serum biomarkers are effective variables to assess intestinal injury in patients with MetS via our nomogram-based risk prediction model. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier ChiCTR2400088476.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.