Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40589507›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025

Evaluation of day 5 versus day 6 blastocyst biopsy in preimplantation genetic testing: clinical and neonatal outcomes.

Zhiming Li, Xiaowu Fang, Lizi Cheng, Zhanhui Ou, Junye Huo, Wenjuan Yu, Jieliang Li, Wanna Ke, Jiaqi Wu, Xiufeng Lin and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zhiming LiReproductive Medicine Center, Boai Hospital of Zhongshan, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.
Xiaowu FangReproductive Medicine Center, Boai Hospital of Zhongshan, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.
Lizi ChengReproductive Medicine Center, Boai Hospital of Zhongshan, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.
Zhanhui OuReproductive Medicine Center, Boai Hospital of Zhongshan, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.
Junye HuoReproductive Medicine Center, Boai Hospital of Zhongshan, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.
Wenjuan YuReproductive Medicine Center, Boai Hospital of Zhongshan, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.
Jieliang LiReproductive Medicine Center, Boai Hospital of Zhongshan, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.
Wanna KeReproductive Medicine Center, Boai Hospital of Zhongshan, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.
Jiaqi WuReproductive Medicine Center, Boai Hospital of Zhongshan, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.
Xiufeng LinReproductive Medicine Center, Boai Hospital of Zhongshan, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.
Xiaojun WenReproductive Medicine Center, Boai Hospital of Zhongshan, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) has emerged as a pivotal technique in assisted reproductive technology for enhancing success rates by identifying euploid embryos prior to transfer. The optimal timing for blastocyst biopsy during PGT remains controversial, with conflicting evidence regarding the clinical outcomes of day 5 (D5) versus day 6 (D6) biopsies, as well as neonatal and perinatal outcomes. Methods: This study involved a retrospective analysis of 3,647 biopsied blastocysts and 673 PGT-frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles conducted at Zhongshan Boai Hospital between May 2019 and September 2024. Patients were categorized into D5 and D6 biopsy groups. The study comprised three components: (1) a comparison of chromosomal euploidy, mosaicism, and aneuploidy rates between the two groups, along with an assessment of clinical, neonatal, and perinatal outcomes in PGT-FET cycles; (2) stratification based on embryo quality to compare clinical, neonatal, and perinatal outcomes in PGT-FET cycles between the two groups; and (3) stratification according to maternal age to compare clinical, neonatal, and perinatal outcomes in PGT-FET cycles between the two groups. Results: The euploidy rate was significantly higher in D5 blastocysts compared to D6 blastocysts (47.53% vs. 32.38%, p < 0.01). In the PGT-FET cycles, the live birth rate in the D5 biopsy group was significantly higher than that in the D6 biopsy group (56.11% vs. 48.38%, p = 0.046); however, there were no significant differences in the clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, or neonatal outcome. Stratification by embryo quality revealed no significant differences in clinical pregnancy, live birth, or miscarriage rates for blastocysts of the same quality grade between the D5 and D6 biopsy groups. In the D5 biopsy group, variations in embryo quality did not affect clinical outcomes, whereas in the D6 biopsy group, high-quality blastocysts were associated with improved pregnancy and live birth rates. Age-stratified analysis showed similar clinical outcomes for PGT-FET in the D5 and D6 biopsy groups across different age groups. Conclusion: Compared to D6, D5 biopsied blastocysts demonstrated higher euploidy and live birth rates. Therefore, it is recommended to prioritize biopsy at D5 and to thaw blastocysts at D5 for transfer to achieve better clinical pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.

Indexed as

BlastocystGenetic TestingPreimplantation DiagnosisAdultAneuploidyBiopsyEmbryo TransferFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnancy RateRetrospective Studiesblastocyst biopsyclinical pregnancy outcomesembryo qualitymaternal ageneonatal-perinatal outcomespreimplantation genetic testing

Identifiers

PMID40589507
PMCPMC12206620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.