Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40589496›Full record

ArticleBMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies2025

Neural network models for predicting readmission among patients undergoing peripheral vascular intervention using electronic health record data and clinical registry data.

Jialin Mao, Philip Goodney, Samprit Banerjee, Zoran Kostic, Kim Smolderen, Carlos Mena-Hurtado, Michael E Matheny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jialin MaoPopulation Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6671-3474
Philip GoodneyVascular Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3973-3506
Samprit BanerjeePopulation Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6936-0846
Zoran KosticElectrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Kim SmolderenCardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Carlos Mena-HurtadoCardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Michael E MathenyBiomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Brentwood, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3217-4147

Funding

Incorporating Learning Effects into Medical Device Active Safety Surveillance MethodsR01HL149948 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MATHENY, MICHAEL E., RESNIC, FREDERIC S · 2020 to 2023
$3.1M
Leveraging linked registry and electronic health records to examine long-term patient outcomes after peripheral vascular intervention"K01HL159315 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI MAO, JIALIN · 2021 to 2025
$810k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL159315NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL149948
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether neural network models based on electronic health record (EHR) data can match and augment the performance of models based on clinical registry data in predicting readmission after peripheral vascular intervention (PVI). Design: Observational cohort study. Setting: Vascular Quality Initiative registry and INSIGHT Clinical Research Network EHR data from multiple academic institutions in New York City. Participants: Patients undergoing PVI during January 1, 2013 to September 30, 2021. Main outcome measures: Our outcome variable was 90-day readmission. We developed logistic regression (LR), multilevel perceptron (MLP), and recurrent neural network (RNN) models using registry alone, EHR data alone, and combined registry-EHR data. EHR data were evaluated using derived variables to match registry variables (EHR-derived data) and clinically meaningful code aggregation (EHR-direct data). Models were evaluated using area under the curve (AUC) for discrimination, Spiegelhalter z score for calibration, and Brier score for overall performance. Results: The analytical cohort included 2348 patients undergoing PVI (mean age: 69.9±11.5 years). 832 (35%) patients were readmitted within 90 days. LR to predict 90-day readmission based on registry data alone had an AUC of 0.710, Spiegelhalter z score of 1.021, and Brier score of 0.211. MLP based on registry data alone had similar performance. MLP and RNN based on EHR-direct data (MLP: AUC=0.742, Spiegelhalter z=0.933, Brier=0.204; RNN: AUC=0.737, Spiegelhalter z=1.026, Brier=0.206) and registry+EHR-direct data (MLP: AUC=0.756, Spiegelhalter z=0.794, Brier=0.199; RNN: AUC=0.751, Spiegelhalter z=1.057, Brier=0.200) had improved performances. LR based on EHR-direct data and combined registry+EHR-direct data had worse performances. Conclusions: EHR data, when used with neural network models, can be useful to establish readmission predictive models or augment clinical registry data. EHR-based models can be potentially embedded in the clinical workflow, but model performance may be constrained by the absence of certain information in clinical encounters, such as social determinants of health.

Indexed as

MethodologyOutcomes ResearchReal World EvidenceVascular Devices

Identifiers

PMID40589496
PMCPMC12207173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.