ArticleJournal of pharmacopuncture2025
Satisfaction with Clinical Clerkship and Its Determinants Among Korean Medicine Students.
Article in Journal of pharmacopuncture, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Student Satisfaction with Pharmacopuncture Education and the Need for Curriculum Improvement.Journal of pharmacopuncture · 2026Article
- Organ-system-based psychiatry education in undergraduate medicine: learning outcomes and specialty choice.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Clinical clerkship is essential for medical education and provides students with hands-on experience and practical skills. Beyond monitoring, understanding the factors influencing satisfaction with clerkship can help improve educational quality. Methods: A satisfaction survey was administered to two cohorts of third- and fourth-year Korean medicine students who completed a 1-year clinical clerkship across 10 specialized departments. The survey consisted of nine items evaluated on a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics, multiple regression analysis and backward stepwise elimination were used to identify the key determinants of satisfaction with clinical clerkship. Results: "Opportunities for interaction with patients" received the lowest average score and showed the greatest variation. In contrast, "enthusiastic guidance from the faculty" had the most significant impact on satisfaction, with students reporting the highest average score. Sufficient opportunities for patient interaction and hands-on clinical skill practice also significantly influenced students' satisfaction, along with appropriate difficulty and time management. Conclusion: Improving student satisfaction with clinical clerkship requires enthusiastic guidance from the faculty, development of effective satisfaction survey tools, strengthening of outpatient department-based training, and efforts to diversify patient groups. Collaborative efforts across the Korean medicine community are essential to enhance the quality of clinical clerkship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.