Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40589448›Full record

ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2025

Clinical Use of Fospropofol Disodium: Evaluation of Pharmacology, Safety, and Efficacy.

Congcong Zou, Hongyang Chen, Yanhua Qiu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Congcong ZouAnesthesia and Surgery Center of West China Xiamen Hospital, Sichuan University, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-9197-055X
Hongyang ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Yanhua QiuAnesthesia and Surgery Center of West China Xiamen Hospital, Sichuan University, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fospropofol disodium (FD) is a safe and effective alternative to propofol, as it avoids injection pain, severe hypotension, significant respiratory depression, and allergic reactions during intravenous anesthesia induction. FD, the water-soluble prodrug of propofol, was initially developed by Eisai in Japan and was approved by the FDA for marketing in the United States in 2008. However, due to formaldehyde accumulation, safety concerns in outpatient settings, and the requirement for administration by anesthesiologists, the product had poor sales and was withdrawn in 2012. Subsequently, short-term FD use was found resulting in limited formaldehyde accumulation, which is then metabolized to formate at levels comparable to endogenous concentrations, posing no significant health risk. Most adverse events, including respiratory depression and hypotension, were found to be transient, self-limiting, and predominantly mild to moderate in severity. On May 25, 2021, the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) approved the injection of FD, with the approval number H20210017. As a new type Class I drug applied for market registration in China, it is indicated for general anesthesia induction in adults. The review covers the known and emerging characteristics of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of FD approved by the FDA and the new type Class I FD approved by China, emphasizing their non-inferior sedative efficacy and relatively mild adverse reactions compared to propofol and provides insights into their safer application in a broader population. Additionally, it highlights the necessity of structured personnel management during sedation and anesthesia procedures. In short, FD can be safely and effectively used for endoscopic examinations, minor surgeries and continuous sedation in the ICU. While FD demonstrates safety and efficacy as a sedative in specific clinical scenarios, larger and more rigorous clinical trials are essential to validate its long-term use, application in high-risk populations, and administration by non-anesthesiologist healthcare providers.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, IntravenousHypnotics and SedativesPropofolHumansAnesthetics, IntravenousfospropofolHypnotics and SedativesPropofolefficacy and safetyfospropofol disodiumgeneral anesthesiainductionpropofolsedation

Identifiers

PMID40589448
PMCPMC12208120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.