ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2025
Clinical Use of Fospropofol Disodium: Evaluation of Pharmacology, Safety, and Efficacy.
Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing the efficacy of fospropofol with propofol and midazolam for goal-directed sedation in critically ill patients: a prospective, open-label, pilot, randomized controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Trial
- Induction of General Anesthesia with Fospropofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Surgery: An Efficacy and Safety Analysis.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Fospropofol vs Propofol for Early Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Prophylaxis in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Median effective dose of fospropofol disodium for suppression of the cough reflex during tracheostomy tube exchange in patients with disorders of consciousness receiving fixed-dose sufentanil.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Fospropofol Disodium for Injection in Subjects with Hepatic Impairment Compared with Healthy Matched Controls: A Prospective Cohort Study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fospropofol disodium (FD) is a safe and effective alternative to propofol, as it avoids injection pain, severe hypotension, significant respiratory depression, and allergic reactions during intravenous anesthesia induction. FD, the water-soluble prodrug of propofol, was initially developed by Eisai in Japan and was approved by the FDA for marketing in the United States in 2008. However, due to formaldehyde accumulation, safety concerns in outpatient settings, and the requirement for administration by anesthesiologists, the product had poor sales and was withdrawn in 2012. Subsequently, short-term FD use was found resulting in limited formaldehyde accumulation, which is then metabolized to formate at levels comparable to endogenous concentrations, posing no significant health risk. Most adverse events, including respiratory depression and hypotension, were found to be transient, self-limiting, and predominantly mild to moderate in severity. On May 25, 2021, the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) approved the injection of FD, with the approval number H20210017. As a new type Class I drug applied for market registration in China, it is indicated for general anesthesia induction in adults. The review covers the known and emerging characteristics of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of FD approved by the FDA and the new type Class I FD approved by China, emphasizing their non-inferior sedative efficacy and relatively mild adverse reactions compared to propofol and provides insights into their safer application in a broader population. Additionally, it highlights the necessity of structured personnel management during sedation and anesthesia procedures. In short, FD can be safely and effectively used for endoscopic examinations, minor surgeries and continuous sedation in the ICU. While FD demonstrates safety and efficacy as a sedative in specific clinical scenarios, larger and more rigorous clinical trials are essential to validate its long-term use, application in high-risk populations, and administration by non-anesthesiologist healthcare providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.