Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40589406›Full record

SynthesisEpidemiology and infection2025

Transmission pathways and risk factors for sporadic salmonellosis and campylobacteriosis: a source attribution meta-analysis of European case-control studies.

Lapo Mughini-Gras, Lena Wijnen, Sara M Pires, Elisa Benincà, Charlotte Onstwedder, Tine Hald, Eelco Franz, Axel Bonacic Marinovic

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Epidemiology and infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lapo Mughini-GrasInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), https://ror.org/04pp8hn57Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5420-949X
Lena WijnenInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), https://ror.org/04pp8hn57Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Sara M PiresNational Food Institute, https://ror.org/04qtj9h94Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7751-1509
Elisa BenincàCenter for Infectious Disease Control, https://ror.org/01cesdt21National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Charlotte OnstwedderCenter for Infectious Disease Control, https://ror.org/01cesdt21National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Tine HaldNational Food Institute, https://ror.org/04qtj9h94Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Lyngby, Denmark.
Eelco FranzCenter for Infectious Disease Control, https://ror.org/01cesdt21National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Axel Bonacic MarinovicCenter for Infectious Disease Control, https://ror.org/01cesdt21National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Case-control studies can provide attribution estimates of the likely sources of zoonotic pathogens. We applied a meta-analytical model within a Bayesian estimation framework to pool population attributable fractions (PAFs) from European case-control studies of sporadic campylobacteriosis and salmonellosis. The input data were obtained from two existing systematic reviews, supplemented with additional literature searches, covering the period 2000-2021. In total, 12 studies on

Indexed as

Campylobacter InfectionsSalmonella InfectionsAnimalsCampylobacterCase-Control StudiesEuropeHumansRisk FactorsSystematic Reviews as TopicZoonosescampylobactercase-control studymeta-analysissalmonellasource attribution

Identifiers

PMID40589406
PMCPMC12247009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.