Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40589380›Full record

ReviewClinical endoscopy2026

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: history and current development.

Zaheer Nabi, D Nageshwar Reddy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zaheer NabiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
D Nageshwar ReddyDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) represents an innovative advancement in minimally invasive surgery, utilizing natural body orifices to access the peritoneal cavity to minimize surgical trauma, reduce postoperative pain, and avoid visible scars. Since its inception, NOTES has faced challenges such as technical complexity and securing safe access closure, which initially limited its widespread adoption. However, advancements in endoscopic techniques and technology, closure devices, and hybrid approaches may revitalize its clinical utility. Hybrid NOTES, particularly transvaginal techniques, has demonstrated significant benefits, including reduced postoperative pain, faster recovery, and improved cosmesis, without compromising safety or efficacy. Innovations such as flexible endoscopic platforms, robotic assistance, and novel suturing techniques address previous limitations and enable broader applications across various gastrointestinal indications. Comparative studies have shown comparable outcomes between NOTES and traditional laparoscopy, with specific advantages in terms of patient comfort and recovery time. As technology evolves, NOTES continues to expand its clinical indications, and its future holds promise with the integration of robotics and artificial intelligence. Further research and structured training programs are crucial to overcome existing barriers and ensure safe and effective implementation in diverse clinical settings.

Indexed as

Endoscopy, gastrointestinalMinimally invasive surgical proceduresNatural orifice endoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID40589380
PMCPMC12936920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.