Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40589379›Full record

ReviewClinical endoscopy2026

Endoscopic approach to indeterminate biliary strictures.

Yousuke Nakai, Ryunosuke Hakuta, Yutaka Shimamatsu, Nao Otsuka, Yukiko Takayama

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yousuke NakaiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryunosuke HakutaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yutaka ShimamatsuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Nao OtsukaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukiko TakayamaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnosis of biliary strictures remains challenging because of the low sensitivity of conventional transpapillary sampling using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. New devices and tips have been developed to increase the diagnostic yield of conventional transpapillary sampling. However, additional endoscopic procedures are often necessary for indeterminate biliary strictures. Two major approaches for indeterminate biliary strictures are endoscopic ultrasonography-guided sampling and peroral cholangioscopy (POCS)-guided biopsy. The selection of modalities should be considered based on the stricture location. Although endoscopic ultrasound is the preferred approach for distal biliary strictures, POCS is preferred for perihilar biliary strictures. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided sampling is highly sensitive in cases with a mass, but the sensitivity of POCS-guided biopsies is unsatisfactory, and discrepancy with the visual diagnosis of POCS is common. Whether these advanced techniques should be performed as the initial procedure or as a rescue after a failed diagnosis by conventional transpapillary sampling needs to be clarified in terms of diagnostic yield and cost-effectiveness.

Indexed as

Biliary stricturesCholangioscopyEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyEndosonography

Identifiers

PMID40589379
PMCPMC12933545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.