ArticleBritish journal of haematology2025
Outcomes of CD19 CAR-T therapy in central nervous system lymphoma: Insights from a multicentre experience.
Article in British journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in molecular pathobiology of PCNSL - towards clinical implementation of novel diagnostics and therapeutics.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Review
- Primary central nervous system lymphoma-current standards and recent developments.Neuro-oncology practice · 2026Review
- CAR T-Cell Therapy in Neurology: A Scoping Review of Neuro-Oncology, Autoimmune Diseases & Neurotoxicity.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
- Advances in CAR-T therapy for central nervous system lymphoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has reshaped the treatment paradigm for relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, its role in central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) remains uncertain. We conducted a multicentre, retrospective study on 54 adult R/R CNSL patients treated at four international institutions with commercial (axi-cel, tisa-cel, liso-cel) or a point of care (POC) CD19-CAR T-cell products. At day 100 post CAR-T infusion, 65% of patients attained a complete response as their best response in both systemic and central nervous system compartments. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.5 months, with a 1-year PFS of 35%. The median overall survival (OS) was 19 months, with a 1-year OS of 63%. In multivariable analyses, CAR-T product was significantly associated with PFS (p = 0.009) and OS (p = 0.013), with patients receiving tisa-cel exhibiting poorer outcomes than axi-cel and patients receiving liso-cel or POC CAR-T product demonstrating better outcomes than axi-cel. Toxicity profiles were consistent with pivotal trials in R/R DLBCL. Grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome occurred in 11% of patients, while grade ≥3 immune-effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome was observed in 28%. Our study supports the feasibility and safety of anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy in CNSL. The specific CAR-T product infused emerged as a factor influencing outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.