Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40589220›Full record

Trial reportJournal of palliative care2026

Primary Care Providers' Perceptions of the CAPACITI Palliative Care Education Trial: A Qualitative Study of Experiences With Self-Directed and Facilitated Modalities.

Shilpa Jyothi Kumar, Valerie Bishop, Daryl Bainbridge, Frances Kilbertus, Kathy Kortes-Miller, Samantha Winemaker, Hsien Seow

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shilpa Jyothi KumarDepartment of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID 0009-0009-1756-1780
Valerie BishopDepartment of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID 0009-0004-1387-9648
Daryl BainbridgeDepartment of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9249-8229
Frances KilbertusNorthern Ontario School of Medicine University, Thunder Bay, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1467-4159
Kathy Kortes-MillerDepartment of Social Work, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0777-890X
Samantha WinemakerDivision of Palliative Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Hsien SeowDepartment of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6701-1714

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectiveCAPACITI (Community Access to PAlliative Care via Interprofessional Teams Improvement) is a virtual training program that teaches primary care providers how to incorporate an early palliative approach to care in practice. Building this capacity can help primary care providers better meet the needs of their seriously ill patients; however, there has been limited in-depth study as to the added benefits of active facilitation in on-line education. We completed a qualitative inquiry with CAPACITI participants to explore perceived differences in self-directed and facilitated e-learning to understand how these modalities contribute to change in practice.MethodsWe completed a qualitative analysis of semi-structured focus groups with primary care teams that participated in CAPACITI. This study was part of a cluster randomized controlled trial where teams were randomized to self-directed or facilitated modalities for each of the three CAPACITI modules. We followed a qualitative descriptive design, using a constant comparative approach to determine emergent themes to understand participant experience and preference in learning modality.ResultsWe conducted 63 focus groups throughout the trial, representing 42 unique teams, about a quarter of which had experienced both learning modalities at the time of the focus group. Qualitative analysis revealed three main themes: changes in thinking (ie identifying patients early in the illness trajectory), change in behavior (ie increased collaboration), and preference in learning modality and perceived benefits. Interestingly, we found no overwhelming preference in learning modality.ConclusionsSelf-directed and facilitated learning modalities were both perceived as effective in promoting changes in thinking and behavior among primary care providers across diverse care settings. Future studies should further explore the use of tailored facilitation such as simulated patient encounters and innovative coaching strategies to optimally promote behavior change in virtual palliative care education.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelPalliative CarePrimary Health CareAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Care TeamQualitative Researchcluster randomized controlled trialeducationhealth personnellearning preferencesonline learningpalliative careprimary caretraining programs

Identifiers

PMID40589220
PMCPMC13013661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.